No. Fed's had a better career, but Nadal belongs in the conversation. Don't be a tool.Just shows these muppets comparing Nadal to Federer are kidding themselves. Joke.
Reckon that's almost all of them tbh. Damn unions.No other workplace in the world would two people get equal money when one does less work AND pulls in less money for the company.
You should come work here mate.Nah that's ridiculous.
No other workplace in the world would two people get equal money when one does less work AND pulls in less money for the company.
More people may watch Sharapova than Simon, but that's because Sharapova is better in comparison, which means she's more likely to progress further into tournaments because she's playing weaker opponents. Winning a female slam should be worth more than the prize money afforded to finishing in the 3rd round in the mens. But how many people consistently watch the players in the females game who get knocked out in the 3rd or so round? Ridiculous argument.
If Gilles Simon plays Nadal in a final, I'm pretty sure more people will be watching Simon than they would be watching a Sharapova vs Kvitova or whoever final.