That and the confected made for TV "blockbusters" which are planned months in advance and turn out to be 11th v 9th. Takes something away I think.
I quite like the fact that teams go through cycles in the AFL.Oh okay. Only 1-4 are easy to pick itbt.
People weren't even certain about Carlton based on their pre-season form and injuries.
Easy to identify GC and GWS will be bottom 2-3, but spots 6-12 are up for grabs imo.
Yeah? If you've got Carlton in there who's missing out from last season's top 4?Oh okay. Only 1-4 are easy to pick itbt.
People weren't even certain about Carlton based on their pre-season form and injuries.
Easy to identify GC and GWS will be bottom 2-3, but spots 6-12 are up for grabs imo.
I don't.Yeah? If you've got Carlton in there who's missing out from last season's top 4?
No you don't. Ask the Titans how they're going buying their way out of a hole.I quite like the fact that teams go through cycles in the AFL.
You have your time at the top, slowly degenerate, bottom out, and then the exciting phase when you're rebuilding again (see West Coast Eagles from 2006 to now). By contrast, in the NRL, you just rebuild by poaching a player.
The NRL boasts about how any team can beat any other team, but I don't think that necessarily makes it a great competition, particularly when that comes about through many of the teams simply not showing up every second week. SOme of the teams are so predictible - they'll put in a great effort one week, and then you just know they will clock off the next week.
Carlton to jump ahead?Eagles to miss the four ftr.
Uhh, what?i always thought melksham had a good future ahead of him, but now I don't know in which sport
You're to be congratulated on a marvellously lawyerly bit of obfuscation then:I don't.
Making a second point unrelated to the first but, to the casual reader, one that could easily be taken as pertaining to it.Oh okay. Only 1-4 are easy to pick itbt.
People weren't even certain about Carlton based on their pre-season form and injuries.