tbh I'm relying on the commentary on the Guardian's website. Sounds like he went through a lot of English tackles - the sort of try that's described as brilliant or shoddy defending depending on your perspective, I suppose.Dunno, that first try was pretty special. Actually, both tries were. It's demonstrated the difference between giving away a lot of penalties against Argentina or Ireland in a warm-up match and giving away a lot of penalties against France.
The difference was bigger than that. Warburton was superb, Chateris was good until he went off. Wales just the better team on the day. The Irish (especially O'Gara) made some unforced tactical kicking errors that cost them at times. Great game though. Fantastic to watch.Difference in the sides was Jamie Roberts - literally. He was involved in the lead up to at least two tries.
Wales beat England in one of the warm-up games didn't they? No reason at all to think they wouldn't repeat it if England somehow win this game.Unlike this one, where the 2nd half has been scratchy with plenty of errors from both sides. If the winner plays like this, then Wales have a fair chance at making the final.
Needless to say it was a bit of both. But Clerc's been scoring bollockloads of tries in spots where he has no right to for as long as I've been watching rugby so I'm generally inclined to give him credit.tbh I'm relying on the commentary on the Guardian's website. Sounds like he went through a lot of English tackles - the sort of try that's described as brilliant or shoddy defending depending on your perspective, I suppose.
I disagree. I think the difference between the teams was more than one player.Possibly an overstatement Heef but without him they wouldn't have won.