If they are willing to cheat, they are willing to do with for both winning and losing. So it doesn't matter.Basically, which is worse - cheating to win, or cheating to lose?
Haha that's the perfect picture for the thread
Probably this. If it was an individual sport then doping and match fixing would be as bad as each other, but the integrity of the game is more likely to be wrecked with match fixing.worst one first-
match fixing > doping > spot fixing
How can you say they were not trying to win??????? They were trying to win (Money).Spot fixing is basically match fixing. For one ball, or two, or whatever, Amir and Asif were trying not to win.
This basically.Spot fixing is basically match fixing. For one ball, or two, or whatever, Amir and Asif were trying not to win.
Am including spot fixing with match fixing there. They are, for all intents and purposes, indistinguishable in my book.
Come off it guys, trying to lose a match is worse than deliberately bowling a no-ball.Spot fixing is basically match fixing. For one ball, or two, or whatever, Amir and Asif were trying not to win.
thats silly.Spot fixing is basically match fixing. For one ball, or two, or whatever, Amir and Asif were trying not to win.