Reckon he'll bowl nicely, have a few deliveries that look awesome but won't get the figures it looks like he should, simply because he doesn't make the batsmen play enough.That'd be true if that happens on a consistent basis though. If it happens for one day, the bowler might in fact be unlucky. Best to wait and watch IMO.
Tipping PK to have an awesome series, personally.
I think the factor you're underestimating is how good England are at playing this type of bowler. These are the batsmen responsible for turning Hilfenhaus into a bowler that you compare someone to when you're trying to argue that they're ****.That'd be true if that happens on a consistent basis though. If it happens for one day, the bowler might in fact be unlucky. Best to wait and watch IMO.
Tipping PK to have an awesome series, personally.
The same Hilfenhaus, by the way, that not a month before the series started everyone was talking about as a real danger man based on his work in India.I think the factor you're underestimating is how good England are at playing this type of bowler. These are the batsmen responsible for turning Hilfenhaus into a bowler that you compare someone to when you're trying to argue that they're ****.
Ha ha
If you had watched him in that tournament you'd have seen that he produced the same mistakes that cost him at Augusta (and replicated at the British Open btw)
Anyway, how is it anti-British to say that Cook and Strauss played poorly and that Kumar didnt bowl as badly as Freddie would like us to think he did - thought that was obvious
It's almost farcical to think that Nick Knight can praise a guy for a play and miss - silly me, I thought that the objective of batting was to hit the ball
Finally, please dont brand me anti-British - Scots, Welsh, and Irish are some of the nicest people you'll ever meet
The same Hilfenhaus, by the way, that not a month before the series started everyone was talking about as a real danger man based on his unlucky work in India.
Yep. I still think he's at least a little bit better than he gets credit for at the moment. England made almost all of the Aussies look worse than they are during that series.The same Hilfenhaus, by the way, that not a month before the series started everyone was talking about as a real danger man based on his work in India.
haha...........social WAGFinally, please dont brand me anti-British - Scots, Welsh, and Irish are some of the nicest people you'll ever meet
gun postIf anyone's going to make Praveen look ordinary it's Zaheer. Yesterday I only watched the morning session but saw way too many balls on an easy to leave line or drifting past the pads, with the swing only serving to take lbw out of the equation.
Praveen's lack of pace is not his problem right now - on the evidence of yesterday he needs to improve his accuracy. And while "massive banana swing" is all well and good, it doesn't help him if most of it is behind the stumps.
Incidentally that says something about Dhoni - the best keepers should be able to stand up to PK, making him vastly more dangerous. Of course, that would mean less ineffective post-stumps swing, so most of the fans singing his praises here would probably be less impressed.
He was okay, nothing more.
He was cramping up in the dressing room after he limped off, apparently. He's allowed to have cramps AND a hamstring injuryHe got a hamstring injury, I'm not really sure why they said it was cramps. Perhaps someone was mistaken.
He started finding the edge consistently by his fourth ever test match? Oh cool, that explains his average of 40 for the first half of his career.I'm already sick of hearing PK is 'unlucky'. Jimmy Anderson used to beat the edge a ****load and I thought he was unlucky too. But you know what he started doing? Finding the edge.
If a bowler consistently misses the edge then that's not unlucky.