37 wickets @ 7.86Jim Laker v Australia 1956
5-58 & 6-55
9-37 & 10-53
4-80 & 3-8
Not a bad run.
That was part of 4 consecutive 10 wkt hauls.Muralitharan 2006
3-62 and 8-70 vs England
4-41 and 6-131 vs South Africa
5-128 and 7-97 vs South Africa
33 wickets @ 16.03
Yeah, that would be better. I can't find any clips on YouTube of his 8-70 against England at Trent Bridge. That was a great, great performance.That was part of 4 consecutive 10 wkt hauls.
The first was 10 for 115 against England 2nd test.
Average improves if you take that as the first.
31 wickets @ 13.5![]()
it used to be on, but the user had to remove it due to copyright stuff.Yeah, that would be better. I can't find any clips on YouTube of his 8-70 against England at Trent Bridge. That was a great, great performance.
And five years later in 1933:Wally Hammond vs Australia in Australia
2nd Test - 251
3rd Test - 200, 32
4th Test - 119*, 177
So, 3 tests, 5 innings, 779 runs @194.75
4 100's and 5 50's in his last 11 innings.Ian Bell v Sri Lanka
1st Test: 103*
2nd Test: 52, 57*
3rd Test: 119*
3 matches, 4 innins, 331 runs @331
Charlton specialised in that role - didn't Kevin Lisbie have an even worse scoring record?Sorry to veer off topic, pretty massively, but Charlton Athletic's Carl Leaburn once went an entire season without scoring, whilst playing as a striker