centurymaker
Cricketer Of The Year
He seamed the ball (or swung it late). Plus he bowled 125-130, not 120.Asif.
He seamed the ball (or swung it late). Plus he bowled 125-130, not 120.Asif.
Ignore that playing off the pitch bit.If you can just always play 120 off the pitch, spinners wouldn't get any wickets. Zaheer rarely gets above 125-128 these days for example.
Every few k's make a massive difference when you are swinging the ball.If you can just always play 120 off the pitch, spinners wouldn't get any wickets. Zaheer rarely gets above 125-128 these days for example.
Well the batting collapse was expected.Should be an easy win for India following the pathetic batting display by the Windies
It's still disappointing that the expected was achievedWell the batting collapse was expected.
No. He's referring to Kohli blowing Fidel Edwards a kiss during his spell.I turned the tv off as soon as the last ball was bowled - did he do something after that?
Calling it btwReally curious to see how Ishant goes.
I can see him doing well tbh. Not saying it'll happen, but its reasonable conditions for his type of bowling imo.
What's the big deal about that? Seems like a good way to make light of or defuse a potentially tense situation.No. He's referring to Kohli blowing Fidel Edwards a kiss during his spell.
.
You must be so jealous of Fidel.No. He's referring to Kohli blowing Fidel Edwards a kiss during his spell.
After the last ball they had a laugh about it and were talking on the way back to the pavilion.
You must be so jealous of Fidel.
two completely different bowlers Asif was mainly a seam bowler while Praveen is a swing bowler.However if you move the ball and are accurate you will always trouble the batsman it does not matter you bowl at 100 kmph or 150 kmph.Modern day batsman are there for the taking for a Praveen type bowler.Asif.
Definitely better than Sreesanth, imo.On the whole I thought he went better than I'd have guessed, but a better bowler for English conditions than Sreesanth or Ishant? Nope.