Watto was aways highly rated on this forum tbf. I was surprised to learn it wasn't the general Australian consensus.Yes, yes, there's always one.
In terms of pure cricketing ability I think he's always been highly rated by the majority of Australian cricket followers. It was just the perception that he cared as much about his hair as his batting and the fact he'd break down on a monthly basis and just came across as a bit of a whinger. Everyone always knew he could play, they just didn't like him.Watto was aways highly rated on this forum tbf. I was surprised to learn it wasn't the general Australian consensus.
Pretty much spot on. You would need to have your head in the sand to ignore the talent of Watson before 2009. He was averaging 50+ in Shield cricket despite all the injuries and was often in the top five or six fastest bowlers in the country. The Watson of 2005 / 2006 was just as capable as the current version. He simply couldn't string two games together back then.Most Australian's who are actually learned on the game have always rated Watson as a player. It should be distinguished from the people who doubted he could have a good career due to injuries though.
If only someone was releasing some form of written report or essay which addresses or comments on these issues...
I'm sorry, I may be missing something here, but I can't remember many Watson 'antics' so to speak of.I'm a known Watson hater (rate him like hell as a player, but he ****s me with his antics), but he deserves the vice-captaincy. Has played his heart out his whole career, especially in the last two years.
Only because it was so girly. Gayle was probably more likely to want to **** him than slap him after that.IMO Gayle would have been within his rights to wrap his bat round Watson's face.
Was utterly embarrasing.