Afridi's got like 15 years experience on Smith. Unfair to compare them yet.impressed with Smith's bowling.got the ball to drift in a lot and bounce also most importantly fairly accurate.poor mans Shahid Afridi
no comparisons.used the word "poor man's"Afridi's got like 15 years experience on Smith. Unfair to compare them yet.
Shahid Afridi darts them in on purpose. Smith is trying to bowl like a normal leggy but has poor control atm.impressed with Smith's bowling.got the ball to drift in a lot and bounce also most importantly fairly accurate.poor mans Shahid Afridi
Mate there are plenty of ODIs won by one player from either side. England won yesterday because of Trott, really.Is it just me or does it feel like Australians at the moment are all playing for their places?
Just the body language and play of players like Clarke, Ponting, White, Dussey (and before the Ashes Mussey) and Hughes all of the appearance of treating every game like their international careers depended on them not getting out. It's like they're afraid of playing shots at the moment for fear of dismissal.
If this actually is the case then it suggests that the dressing room culture at the moment is rather toxic and should be being addressed by the coaches and selectors. Right now it's this lack of strokeplay which has hurt us in all of the games we've lost - from the Ashes to the most recent ODI.
We won the first ODI because Watto (who has no concerns about his place) hit a ton. We won the next ODI because Marsh (who went out trying to prove a point) hit a ton. We won the third because the English didn't make enough runs and then Haddin smacked a quickfire fifty.
It really concerns me that our players might be taking on too much pressure when they go out to bat and getting out because of it.
My view is that there's no downside to S.Smith.Steven Smith
WAG
Has so much upside this kid
Yeah this. A few of the good English Test batsmen who never cracked ODIs tended to have one or two main scoring areas, hence their struggles. Such as Vaughan.What gets me with Smith, especially last night, and with a number o younger blokes, is a preoccupation with scoring in a certain zone. I realise it's difficult, but what I think sets the really good to great LO batsmen apart is an ability to score in more than one zone.
Last night saw Smith seemingly preoccupied with staying leg side of the ball and smashing through covers. I'm not being too hard on the kid here, as it was a tough situation tbf, but the good players adapt. If the ball isn't where their primary scoring area is for a given field, they still find a way to hit to different areas. Someone like Bevan or Hussey, sure they'll want to go over cover, but if the ball is full on leg stump they'll have a zone to hit to on the on side. I just think Smith's approach last night was a little one dimensional.
Jack of all trades and master of none.My view is that there's no downside to S.Smith.
Roger Harper of Aussie cricket.
Problem is Harper could be carried in that Windies team to an extent.My view is that there's no downside to S.Smith.
Roger Harper of Aussie cricket.
3-1 up there, bud.Problem is Harper could be carried in that Windies team to an extent.
I don't know if you watched the whole match because Smith bowled the odd decent ball, but every over was full of dirty long hops and full tosses. The ball that got Bell was decent but the other wickets were off bad balls and the amount of full tosses he bowls is amazing, for a international player.impressed with Smith's bowling.got the ball to drift in a lot and bounce also most importantly fairly accurate.poor mans Shahid Afridi
aye watch the whole match and stand in what i said this is the best i've seen him bowl.he got the ball to drift in to the right hander and thats why PK couldn't hit the ball as straight as he intented.Prior was done by the extra bounce so those wickets looked down to some silly batting but they arn'tI don't know if you watched the whole match because Smith bowled the odd decent ball, but every over was full of dirty long hops and full tosses. The ball that got Bell was decent but the other wickets were off bad balls and the amount of full tosses he bowls is amazing, for a international player.
Because he's done nothing since his return to the side to merit his continued inclusion.Why is Bell's spot being questioned? Who would England replace him with? Surely it's between Trott and Collingwood for the last slot in the middle order?
He really, really wasn't. It was an absolutely filthy long hop.aye watch the whole match and stand in what i said this is the best i've seen him bowl.he got the ball to drift in to the right hander and thats why PK couldn't hit the ball as straight as he intented.Prior was done by the extra bounce so those wickets looked down to some silly batting but they arn't