Generally you'll make your fortune by being a good international cricketer though.The hardest part, as Warne said in the Herald yesterday, is getting all the players to 'buy in' to getting back to the top. When these days you can make a fortune as a non-Test cricketer, is there the will there amongst the group to climb back to the top?
Based entirely on these stats I'd personally go for something like this:Apologies to the poster who did all the work, but looking at a post on another forum (BF) which we can't link to, he's detailed all the stats of guys over the past three seasons of Shield cricket, including this one.
Batsmen
Hodge: 1079 @ 63.47, 100x3, 50x5
Khawaja: 1821 @ 60.70, 100x6, 50x8
Rogers: 1880 @ 60.65, 100x7, 50x7
Klinger: 2320 @ 55.24, 100x6, 50x11
Hughes: 1962 @ 54.50, 100x7, 50x8
Cosgrove: 1324 @ 50.92, 100x6, 50x4
Smith: 1036 @ 49.33, 100x4, 50x2
Marsh: 1058 @ 48.09, 100x2, 50x8
White: 905 @ 47.63, 100x2, 50x6
Hussey: 1893 @ 47.33, 100x5, 50x10
McDonald: 1161 @ 44.65, 100x5, 50x4
Lynn: 681 @ 45.40, 100x2, 50x2
Ferguson: 981 @ 44.59, 4x100, 3x50
Cowan: 1121 @ 43.12, 100x3, 50x4
Spinners:
O'Keefe: 27 @ 23.96 (252 @ 50.40, 50x2)
Doherty: 24 @ 30.08
Krezja: 29 @ 30.31
Hauritz: 35 @ 30.66
North: 20 @ 34.60
McGain: 32 @ 35.03
Smith: 33 @ 42.36
Bailey: 17 @ 43.88
Beer: 11 @ 44.18
Holland: 25 @ 52.84
Quicks
Copeland: 60 @ 18.17
Faulkner: 27 @ 21.52
Duffield: 18 @ 22.17
Swan: 83 @ 22.99
Butterworth: 70 @ 23.04
Hastings: 63 @ 23.60
Hopes: 53 @ 23.79
McKay: 60 @ 23.80
Geeves: 57 @ 24.86
Magoffin: 69 @ 24.96
McDonald: 61 @ 25.61
Cameron: 30 @ 26.60
Hazlewood: 13 @ 28.54
Cutting: 55 @ 28.73
George: 73 @ 28.86
Walter: 30 @ 30.43
Starc: 25 @ 34.24
Keepers
Nevill: 444 @ 63.43, 100x2, 50x1
Wade: 1521 @ 43.46, 100x2, 50x11
Hartley: 1614 @ 40.35, 100x4, 50x9
Manou: 990 @ 36.67, 100x3, 50x4
Ronchi: 1141 @ 32.60, 100x3, 50x2
Paine: 816 @ 31.38, 50x7
6. T.Paine TAS 26 15 28 2 816 74 31.38 0 7 54 3
Not in my house.Martyn is a desperately underrated cricketer.
Didn't he score a match-winning fourth-innings hundred at SA in 2006? Hodge should have certainly had a go after he called it a day.Personally speaking he was perfectly rated to me he should have never being put back into the test side after he was dropped. It was the strangest decision I have ever seen in Cricket. Drop Hodge for someone who was older averaging less in the game and was flat out the worse of the two cricketer's.
I'm still of the opinion that in the majority of cases only the players incapable of playing test cricket want to become a 20/20 specialist. Dave Warner a classic exampleThe hardest part, as Warne said in the Herald yesterday, is getting all the players to 'buy in' to getting back to the top. When these days you can make a fortune as a non-Test cricketer, is there the will there amongst the group to climb back to the top?
And batsmen from South Africamore bowlers from new south wales imo.
The teams you named are definitely no easy beats, and with the current team we are more or less likely to lose to these sides. This current lot has lost the last 6 of their 9 tests so surely changes need to be made and younger talent needs to be introduced.The next goal really should be the test series against SL, India and SA. No point losing all of them badly by playing a pack of young blokes in the (albeit somewhat informed) hope that they'll be test class in two year's time.