• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kallis vs Ponting as test batsmen

Who is the better test batsman


  • Total voters
    140

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Totally agree. If they score a similar amount of runs at a similar average over a long period of time, they're of similar quality.

It's the ODIs. Here we talk exclusively about tests and most agree they're all extremely close, but if you gave a decent weighting to ODIs Tendulkar would come out on top.
Yep.. AWTA.. With ODIs taken into account, guess Sachin, Viv and to an extent Ponting sort of pull ahead a bit more than the others...
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Kallis surely slightly ahead at this point for me. The way he tackled an on-fire Harbhajan in sorely testing circumstances to save a match and series is something that Ponting does not quite have in his resume.

However, a good series for Ponting later this year in SL could change that equation.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
It's quite amazing how Kallis has gone from underrated to overrated in the span of a series. Look, Kallis is a fantastic cricketer; an all-time great. His batting is in the league of Sachin, Ponting, Dravid and Lara, certainly. However, I would say he is inferior to them, still. With regards to Ponting; one has to remember that Kallis has scored a ****load against B/Z where Ponting has had very few matches against them.

Without minnows, the difference between them is 2 runs on average in favour of Kallis and 15 points on SR in favour of Ponting. I'd say that more or less puts them equal in terms of crude output. I say that because I read Marcuss arguing how Kallis simply scored more runs and was hence better. That's like saying Yousuf is better than Steve Waugh.

But that doesn't scratch the surface IMO because it says little about the quality of the runs scored. I'd always thought Kallis generally scored runs in easier situations/against easier attacks than Ponting but I decided to see if that is the case. Since they're both practically the same age, have played the same amount, debuted the same year and even peaked during the same decade against most the same attacks I decided to look at their records since 1995 - the year they debuted. I have ranked the best bowling attacks from top to bottom and shown who has done better against them.



The top 5 attacks during their time were Australia, S.Africa, Sri Lanka, England and Pakistan. Against them Kallis averages 44.87 @ 44; Ponting averages 52.22 @ 61. Furthermore, Ponting averages above 50 away and at home against all of them bar England (42 and 44). Kallis on the other hand averages in the 30s against both SL and Aus in S.Africa. He averages in the 20s against England in England and in the 30s against SL in SL. At home, he averages above 43 only against Pakistan.

Of course Ponting doesn't face Australia and Kallis doesn't face S.Africa. However, Ponting has a fantastic record against S.Africa and Kallis has a mediocre record against Australia. Where Kallis catches up overall is against the bottom 5 attacks. Not that Ponting does poorly; Kallis just made merry to a greater extent.

Against the bottom 5 attacks Kallis averages 76.74 @ 46; Ponting averages 55.35 @ 58. Against these teams Ponting averages 60+ in every country bar India where he averages in the 20s (note: he had 1 inning in Zimbabwe where he made 31). Kallis too has a fantastic record where he averages above 50 against everyone home and away (note: he had 3 innings in Bangladesh where he averaged 33).

All this is not to point out that Kallis hasn't played quality innings. But on the whole I'd argue much less than Ponting has against the best attacks, home and away.

When I was looking up their records I was very impressed by Kallis' 3rd/4th innings average. With a bit more scrutiny, however, I was a bit disappointed. Kallis has really played for the red ink there. He really piled on the runs in draws that were going nowhere or innings where S.Africa were obviously going to declare they were so ahead. I invite you to look at his 100s in draws and analyse them for yourself. It goes to show you that sometimes perceptions are correct (i.e. Kallis being seemingly selfish) and I get the impression of Kallis being a cricketer who certainly knew his numbers and played for them. I know innings where the likes of Ponting, Lara or Sachin once got to 100s and then let loose for the sake of their team whereas I can recall very few for Kallis.

On the whole, I like that Kallis wasn't battered in this poll; I think he deserves to be thought of alongside the best batsmen of his day. But he was not Ponting's equal, anymore than Barrington was Sobers' IMO- and I actually think the latter pair have more of a debate.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
It's quite amazing how Kallis has gone from underrated to overrated in the span of a series. Look, Kallis is a fantastic cricketer; an all-time great. His batting is in the league of Sachin, Ponting, Dravid and Lara, certainly. However, I would say he is inferior to them, still. With regards to Ponting; one has to remember that Kallis has scored a ****load against B/Z where Ponting has had very few matches against them.

Without minnows, the difference between them is 2 runs on average in favour of Kallis and 15 points on SR in favour of Ponting. I'd say that more or less puts them equal in terms of crude output. I say that because I read Marcuss arguing how Kallis simply scored more runs and was hence better. That's like saying Yousuf is better than Steve Waugh.

But that doesn't scratch the surface IMO because it says little about the quality of the runs scored. I'd always thought Kallis generally scored runs in easier situations/against easier attacks than Ponting but I decided to see if that is the case. Since they're both practically the same age, have played the same amount, debuted the same year and even peaked during the same decade against most the same attacks I decided to look at their records since 1995 - the year they debuted. I have ranked the best bowling attacks from top to bottom and shown who has done better against them.



The top 5 attacks during their time were Australia, S.Africa, Sri Lanka, England and Pakistan. Against them Kallis averages 44.87 @ 44; Ponting averages 52.22 @ 61. Furthermore, Ponting averages above 50 away and at home against all of them bar England (42 and 44). Kallis on the other hand averages in the 30s against both SL and Aus in S.Africa. He averages in the 20s against England in England and in the 30s against SL in SL. At home, he averages above 43 only against Pakistan.

Of course Ponting doesn't face Australia and Kallis doesn't face S.Africa. However, Ponting has a fantastic record against S.Africa and Kallis has a mediocre record against Australia. Where Kallis catches up overall is against the bottom 5 attacks. Not that Ponting does poorly; Kallis just made merry to a greater extent.

Against the bottom 5 attacks Kallis averages 76.74 @ 46; Ponting averages 55.35 @ 58. Against these teams Ponting averages 60+ in every country bar India where he averages in the 20s (note: he had 1 inning in Zimbabwe where he made 31). Kallis too has a fantastic record where he averages above 50 against everyone home and away (note: he had 3 innings in Bangladesh where he averaged 33).

All this is not to point out that Kallis hasn't played quality innings. But on the whole I'd argue much less than Ponting has against the best attacks, home and away.

When I was looking up their records I was very impressed by Kallis' 3rd/4th innings average. With a bit more scrutiny, however, I was a bit disappointed. Kallis has really played for the red ink there. He really piled on the runs in draws that were going nowhere or innings where S.Africa were obviously going to declare they were so ahead. I invite you to look at his 100s in draws and analyse them for yourself. It goes to show you that sometimes perceptions are correct (i.e. Kallis being seemingly selfish) and I get the impression of Kallis being a cricketer who certainly knew his numbers and played for them. I know innings where the likes of Ponting, Lara or Sachin once got to 100s and then let loose for the sake of their team whereas I can recall very few for Kallis.

On the whole, I like that Kallis wasn't battered in this poll; I think he deserves to be thought of alongside the best batsmen of his day. But he was not Ponting's equal, anymore than Barrington was Sobers' IMO- and I actually think the latter pair have more of a debate.
TBH, I think it's just a fad considering the recent form of Ponting and Kallis (all of us fall into these traps sometimes). I'm pretty sure that once the careers of both are over and the same poll is run again, Ponting will win probably 80-20.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, maybe. It just seems even more ridiculous than usual currently to suggest that Kallis doesn't score difficult or important runs and Ponting does.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
I'm not suggesting (or not trying to) that Kallis doesn't score important runs. But the difference between them was never about the quantity of runs scored but the quality of attacks they usually scored against. Kallis piled on the runs against a team he's always piled the runs on against. That attack may have improved in terms of helping their teams get a result, but it's not a miserly attack at all. The difference between Kallis' scoring against the top 5 and bottom 5 is marked.

Ones in a terrible slump, the other is doing well and I get that. But I think people are starting to overrate Kallis now.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I'd be interested to see how my standardised averaged would treat them. I get the feeling Ponting would come out slightly on top, actually.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Kinda odd that Ponting comes out ahead of Kallis in runs against England, if that's your point. Cashed in against joke attacks, flopped against the excellent ones and Kallis did precisely the opposite.
 
Ricky faced crap attacks in south africa.He scored 100s against deon pretorious,andrew hall and ntini who didnt peak.Kallis avg against mcgrath and warne in aus is above 50.Kallis is in a diff planet when it comes to playing spin and swing.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
It's funny that England's attack was one of the best while India's wasn't.
Dude, indian attack has been pretty ordinary over the years. They have always, somehow :laugh: , done the job at hand and have never really looked threatening.

Just loook at their avgs mate.
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Ricky faced crap attacks in south africa.He scored 100s against deon pretorious,andrew hall and ntini who didnt peak.Kallis avg against mcgrath and warne in aus is above 50.Kallis is in a diff planet when it comes to playing spin and swing.
Ponting averages 63 when either Pollock or Donald bowled and 47 when both did.

Kallis averages 38 when either Warne or McGrath bowled and 40 when both did.

Kallis averages in the 30s against SL, home and away and averages in the 20s against England in England - per your swing and spin remark.

I get banned for a month and you stop posting for a month. And the day I post you return...
 
Last edited:

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Kinda odd that Ponting comes out ahead of Kallis in runs against England, if that's your point. Cashed in against joke attacks, flopped against the excellent ones and Kallis did precisely the opposite.
In 35 tests, Ponting's only had 2 poor series, one in 98 and the current one now.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Pretty true, but to be fair they've always been a very different bowling proposition at home. Anil and Harby have been pretty potent throughout the last 15 years in India.
 

Top