Wtf does that have to do with it?Love how people are now criticising the decision to bat first. Yeah because conceding 600+ was so part of the plan.
God, that's just awful.
Read a stat recently where we've had something like 9 run outs over the past 10 Tests. Good teams don't have that happen. Grade teams don't have that happen, FFS.
Hmmm, I think.........yes........I believe I'm seeing where the problem lies.Watson has now been involved in seven run outs.
I wonder if KP will insist on doing tonight's interview...Okay that's just despicable. That's truly despicable. No one comes out with credit from that.
It was such a random run out, I mean if they put in a bit of effort then they would have gotten two runs easily, and somehow Watson managed to run himself out.Unbelievable
I feel almost angry at how stupid that is
The point of batting first here is that you don't want to bat last. Because we've conceded 600 we're now batting last. When you have a side 5/220 that simply should not happen.Wtf does that have to do with it?
Because Pietersen's pick up and release were lightning fast. Hughes would have struggled to get halfway down the track if he'd gone.Maybe Watto's fault, but no idea why Hughes didn't manage to get two runs there.
Really? Watto had pretty much completed two runs jogging, and he's hardly Usain Bolt.Because Pietersen's pick up and release were lightning fast. Hughes would have struggled to get halfway down the track if he'd gone.
I reckon they'd still have got there if they'd run properly. Hell, Watson basically walked down the other end and basically made it.Because Pietersen's pick up and release were lightning fast. Hughes would have struggled to get halfway down the track if he'd gone.
Please, Inzi wouldn't have called for a second to begin withThat's almost Inzi-esque.
That is so bad.