Dude, you're preaching to the choir.Well, when you play a shot, usually it's with an intention to either not lose a wicket, or score some runs. Sometimes you risk your wicket to play a shot that will yield in runs. But he plays a shot to a ball that has no way to take his wicket, except if he risks a shot. Except that risk never actually yields runs, so he is basically risking his wicket because......??
- Play a shot to a ball head height two feet away from the stumps...and have it go to gully for no run every time
- ???
- Profit
Was a very fine nick tbh, and it wasn't clear if it carried.Terrible decision tbh, might hurt SA.
Certainly did.Did Boucher take it clean?
Wasn't really clear from the replays too.Did Boucher take it clean? No doubt at all there was an edge.
Boucher went up didn't he? Steyn might not have heard it but umpire definitely should've given that out. And replays show that it did carry, but that's not the point, umpire failed to spot the edge imo.Was a very fine nick tbh, and it wasn't clear if it carried.
The SA appeal was really half hearted too.
I doubt whether they would have reviewed it too.
But if Steyn did not hear it,what chance did the umpire have of hearing it.Boucher went up didn't he? Steyn might not have heard it but umpire definitely should've given that out. And replays show that it did carry, but that's not the point, umpire failed to spot the edge imo.
They already showed the snicko and he Certainly edged it.Why the **** aren't the commies analyzing the ball with snicko and slowmo at Boucher?
Sanga tbh.The best bowler in the world vs the best batsman in the world.
Amazing cricket.