simmy
International Regular
Yeah that photo isnt bad... but I still love my avatar more!The iconic photo of the series so far?
Both, in different ways sum up 3 of the 4 tests so far.
Yeah that photo isnt bad... but I still love my avatar more!The iconic photo of the series so far?
Thank **** someone else isn't ********.tbh, I thought the run was on, took a top throw to nail Hughes without which it would have been a cheeky single.
It was just unnecessary.
Ha hatbh, I thought the run was on, took a top throw to nail Hughes without which it would have been a cheeky single.
It was just unnecessary.
Look at him. He's just a ****.If Hughes had pulled out a Trott-esque dive I think he would have been safe.
But you just don't have to take those risks, in that game situation.
Also, why is "Twatto" disliked by most? Seems a decent enough guy and one of Australia's most consistent performers over the last 18 months
I think he's no worse than average in the field and just stands out because England are now a very good fielding side.Also, I don't understand why people keep saying Trott's a wheelie bin and can't field. He's slow, yes, but he's clearly got a good arm. Thus the two run outs in this series - one of them direct and the other pretty much direct.
He's a good catcher too - anyone see the pocket catch? Thats takes genius.
Any other fielder and they wouldn't have gone, yes?Ha ha
"Let's hit the ball slightly to the left of one of the slowest outfielders in world cricket and see whether he can throw it back to the keeper from 15 metres away'
Any other fieldsman and he wouldve been out by yards
Shocker
I genuinely don't understand the logic here. Attempting a cheeky but unnecessary single where you'll be run out by a top throw is brainless. Yes it might make sense in a hurried run chase but in an Ashes-deciding backs-to-the-wall effort, it's as brainless and wasteful as you can get. In that context, a cheeky single with that level of risk was never "on".tbh, I thought the run was on, took a top throw to nail Hughes without which it would have been a cheeky single.
It was just unnecessary.
Agreed, should attempt more runs when the ball is hit straight to close in fielders.Again, it was only 'on' from the perspective whether there was technically a run there. Already said it was unnecessary in the context of the game.
Ahem to thatSo proud to be English right now.