Not sure I agree. They've given plenty of quarter/half opportunities with some poor shot selection. They've ridden their luck and come through well in tough conditions, but I would say that's not how to play in these conditions. A bit more circumspection would be in order, because right now, I'd reckon the Aussies feel as if a wicket isn't far away.
No, you just being a ****wit making ridiculous assertions that players' records count for nothing. The existence of a thing called "cricket chat" likely suggests you're wrong.
Corrected for Facts.
I'll repeat, he's doing a good job of proving me wrong. His performances 4 years ago were the perfect indicator to this series
I'm posting on my phone, google 'Comical Ali' you lazy bastard.
Yes. I'm expecting Nathan Hauritz to tour India in four years time and take 45 wickets in three tests, because, well, what's gone before, she counts for nowt.
Nine times out of ten you simply have to have a bit of luck to survive against good bowling on a decent pitch.
Yeah, assuming Hauritz performs well above his career average between now and then and it suddenly comes out Hauritz had a deformed index finger during that series.
Fairly accurate summary tbh.
You never know, it may have been the most important thing in the world.
I get I'm probably included in this post but still, I've agreed with more of your posts in the last 3 days then ever before. You've changed.
This man knows what's up.
3 Tests when he was coming back from injury, when he's been a much better and improved bowler since 2008 isn't a great indicator of how he'll go.
Well if you like I can express the fact that Australia are ****e a little more nicely but telling it less straight would be a particularly odd request coming from you.
