I would say Pujara would be there.Who do people think will be the outstanding batsmen/bowler of the generation (the player who stands out amongst his contemporaries), say, for the next decade between 2010-2020? That would mean players now who are between the age of about 18-25.
You can blame/thank India for that.No young, express fast bowler has been found after Tait right? Need one of them to make fast bowling ***y again. Been a long time since we saw a 100Mph delivery live.
AB De Villiers, IMO. He's 26 and has 10 years in him.Who do people think will be the outstanding batsmen/bowler of the generation (the player who stands out amongst his contemporaries), say, for the next decade between 2010-2020? That would mean players now who are between the age of about 18-25.
100Mph = 160Kmph(roughly). Not 150.Didn't Lasith Malinga touch 150 km/h in one of the ODI's against India this year ?
YouTube - Shaun Tait fastest 160.7 kph.mp4100Mph = 160Kmph(roughly). Not 150.
More like 148+ IMO, not 150. Fernando sent few 150-151 in Australia though.Didn't Lasith Malinga touch 150 km/h in one of the ODI's against India this year ?
Honestly tell me how many did bowl around 160? Possibly less than ten in all history. Md. Zahid, Md. Akram, Shoaib Akthar, Shaun Tait, Brett Lee, Jeff Thompson and possibly Michael Holding and Md. Sami. Almost all of them are post 1970. Only exception I could think of are Roy Gilchrist, Fred Trueman and Frank Tyson. But I feel they are more 150k bowlers rather than 160k bowlers with possible exception of Gilchrist.100Mph = 160Kmph(roughly). Not 150.
I really doubt that. May have been 150k, but not 160k.Larwood, by all accounts, was very very fast as well, particularly in his younger years.