Jacknife
International Captain
Rubbish when he took it he didn't look certain and neither did his team mates.Haha such bull**** arguments above. Yeah it's the fielder's fault for not celebrating like crazy that the third umpire didn't give it.
Rubbish when he took it he didn't look certain and neither did his team mates.Haha such bull**** arguments above. Yeah it's the fielder's fault for not celebrating like crazy that the third umpire didn't give it.
Hey I said I reckon he caught it fair and square. But the TV replays can't prove that conclusively at all. If you're the 3rd umpire are you more likely to give it out if the guy who caught it says it is out or if he isn't sure? It's just natural human instinct.Haha such bull**** arguments above. Yeah it's the fielder's fault for not celebrating like crazy that the third umpire didn't give it.
Back then though those guys showed they were good enough to play test cricket when given the chance. They just didn't get then chance very often/for very long in most cases.Yeah you've got a point, but realistically, they are about as gooder players as the back-ups in the 1990's like Law, Lehmann etc were.
WTF?It's his own fault, if he did catch it, he should have claimed it instead of been unsure about it.Pointing usually would be sure of that.
But how is it relevant at all? It's like that bull**** argument that "oh that must be out because the appeal was spontaneous". When it goes down to referral the only thing that matters is whether he caught it cleanly on camera or not.Rubbish when he took it he didn't look certain and neither did his team mates.
Don’t worry, I’m sure he will get 2 for 200 in the next test.
Who has the better match figures?
Better than Swann again? Or worse this time?
At the end of the day ,he probably did catch it and it's **** when it's that close,like you said the 3rd umpire could only go on the video evidence.But how is it relevant at all? It's like that bull**** argument that "oh that must be out because the appeal was spontaneous". When it goes down to referral the only thing that matters is whether he caught it cleanly on camera or not.
---
Oh what a shot!
Presumably they mean the likes of Katich and Hussey (i.e. the performing players) and not the twenty something bowling attack?Funny ABC radios talking abouit players retiring now to give others a shot. i said that before in jest :|
England will want them to be scoring 6, 6.5 an over. They won't gift Australia the chance at winning when they've fought so hard and they know the damage done by this to the bowlers is immense. They want to spare their own bowlers.Australia would need to score at 5+ an over now if they were to bat.
50 overs remaining. I`d have a crack at them. You never know...
That's probably how Strauss sees it, if Oz played it like a 50 over they could get there, if they played well.Therefore, don't give them a chance till there's no doubt.Australia would need to score at 5+ an over now if they were to bat.
50 overs remaining. I`d have a crack at them. You never know...