• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand in India 2010

_Ed_

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He's running OK between the wickets as well. And just belted a six down the ground.
 
ankitj

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
BTW I heard Gavaskar say during commentary that footwork and technique are over-rated. Something that I always believed but surprising to hear that from Gavaskar! :)
 
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
vcs said:
Well, the more time we can get to take 20 wickets with our bowlers, the better.

Tendulkar is well capable of taking the odd calculated risk (as he did against Hauritz and Johnson in the last match), why not do it a bit more? He ended up messing with Laxman's rhythm as well and by the time Raina and the rest come in, the bowlers are in a groove.
Click to expand...
Strangely (or maybe not so strangely ;) ) muted reactions to the fact that Sachin scored even slower than Dravid... Same with Laxman.. Sometimes the images the cricketers create are a LOT more visible than reality...
 
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
vcs said:
Well, the more time we can get to take 20 wickets with our bowlers, the better.

Tendulkar is well capable of taking the odd calculated risk (as he did against Hauritz and Johnson in the last match), why not do it a bit more? He ended up messing with Laxman's rhythm as well and by the time Raina and the rest come in, the bowlers are in a groove.
Click to expand...
Lol we've had 4 sessions of cricket. It would have been better to survive and score over 500 runs, rather than be all out for 400 and have "more time to bowl them out".

If it was late on day 2 fair enough. But to suggest that time is an issue when we basically have scored 400 runs in 4 sessions is ridiculous.
 
Prince EWS

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Jono said:
Lol we've had 4 sessions of cricket. It would have been better to survive and score over 500 runs, rather than be all out for 400 and have "more time to bowl them out".

If it was late on day 2 fair enough. But to suggest that time is an issue when we basically have scored 400 runs in 4 sessions is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Yeah, up to a point you give yourselves more time to bowl the opposition out just by scoring runs. To use an extreme example, if the opposition are chasing 100 runs and have two day left in the Test, you don't actually have two days to bowl them out - you have forty over tops.
 
Last edited:
Jono

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
This is proof at how ludicrous the idea of scoring quickly and sacrificing wickets are. ****in hell.

It's a tough wicket to bat on. Need as many runs as possible
 
Spark

Spark

Global Moderator
These Third Reich analogies on the Sofa are appalling...

...and hilarious.

Operation Barbarossa :laugh:
 
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Seems cricinfo are confirming the news about Malaria.. We are done and dusted in this game then, without our captain and regular keeper.. :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top