robelinda
International Vice-Captain
Yeah youre right, england didnt really compete- its was a right thrashing.Strauss - I don't recall the Ashes being competed for in 1998/99
Yeah youre right, england didnt really compete- its was a right thrashing.Strauss - I don't recall the Ashes being competed for in 1998/99
YouTube - Flintoff runs out Ponting (Ashes 2009)63.6 Harmison to Hussey, lovely nudged off his hips to mid-on. But hang on - Flintoff's got a rocket arm and he throws down Ponting's stumps! He's gone! Flintoff celebrates before the replays, down on one knee, arms outstretched ala Lord's. Flintoff has done it for England 217/3
YouTube - History of the Ashes (Language warning)In Affectionate Remembrance
of
ENGLISH CRICKET,
which died at the Oval
on
29th AUGUST 1882,
Deeply lamented by a large circle of sorrowing
friends and acquaintances
R.I.P.
N.B.—The body will be cremated and the
ashes taken to Australia.
... Except the burning of the bails is the whole reason it's called the Ashes.Flintoff's direct hit.
It's one of the cricketing moments which make the Ashes memorable, and add more lore to the symbolism and history.
Of course, but then you could vote it above pretty much any cricket moment for that reason alone. So where exactly do you draw the line?... Except the burning of the bails is the whole reason it's called the Ashes.
Why does there have to be a line to draw?Of course, but then you could vote it above pretty much any cricket moment for that reason alone. So where exactly do you draw the line?
Well, we might end it right here and give it to the burning of the bails, right?Why does there have to be a line to draw?
If it was up to me, I would.Well, we might end it right here and give it to the burning of the bails, right?
I totally understand it was a seminal moment that signified the start of the contest, but it's the cricket that makes it memorable for me. Each to their own, obviously.