Kept lowMissed another straight one...
Yeah, the guy's success is inexplicable at times.5-for for Mitch then.
Been an absolutely mental spell. 5/64 looks great on this pitch and it is, but still...
No mate I never said Siddle for Johnson..And to think NUFAN wanted him dropped for a half-fit Siddle.
First time I've heard VVS Laxman called a non-batsmanThis is not a Test standard bottom five. Four complete non-batsmen. Why can't they do something about it? It's messed up a good effort by the top five batsmen, and a matter of concern, often neglected. It's feeble, and they need to beef it up, not slot in a batsman as a quick fix.
Laxman got a good one, struggled with a bad back, hence came in late and could do little, but there's no way you can call Ishant a recognised batsman. He can't score runs. Nor can any of the others. Maybe a little annoyance to the bowlers, only to annoy their own fans a little later by getting out for next to nothing.First time I've heard VVS Laxman called a non-batsman
Yes you did tbh.No mate I never said Siddle for Johnson..
You posted that in the Pakistan series thread. And we did lose that match.If we lose this the selectors will be forced to make some changes and the players I would be looking to remove are the 2 WA players, North and Johnson.
1 Hughes 2 Katich 3 Ponting 4 Clarke 5 Hussey 6 Watson 7 Haddin 8 Hauritz 9 Hilfenhaus 10 Siddle 11 Bollinger is the XI I would like to see at our best.
I think Usman Khawaja and Shaun Marsh are our next best batting options. Khawaja must be very close to making his debut in place of the ageing Mike Hussey. Shaun Marsh's record doesn't look that flash, but I like his technique, think he will eventually take over Ponting at 3.
Our next quick in line is Ryan Harris, who will be putting pressure on all 3 quicks and depending on conditions might even be a better option than the 3 I've named.
Yeah, I'd think the same but Australia's slender lead + VVS's back makes them favourites, I guess.Lead for Oz. Wouldn't have called it with Sachin and Raina in, so fair play.
Still looks a draw to me, this makes all three results possible again. Collapse either way and it's game on.