zaremba
Cricketer Of The Year
YipAs good as any player in the world in the last 10 years, and belongs in any "all-time greats" conversation.
In other words, obscenely underrated.
YipAs good as any player in the world in the last 10 years, and belongs in any "all-time greats" conversation.
In other words, obscenely underrated.
AWTA- but he wasn't surely worse than Sehwag, you just can't say that.Among those Batsman whose Career started in the early years of the 00s, I would put him just below Sehwag. Amazing to watch. and most importantly, the classiest sledger of 'em all.
If you misinterpreted my statement, What I meant is IMO, Sanga is the second best Batsman to start his career in the early 00s, after a certain Virender Sehwag. It's perfectly understandable to think the contrary and most people do so.AWTA- but he wasn't surely worse than Sehwag, you just can't say that.
Yeah true...Sangakkara is an amazing package on and off the field.the classiest sledger of 'em all.
No I agree on that I just don't think anyone can say Sehwag is a better batsman is all.If you misinterpreted my statement, What I meant is IMO, Sanga is the second best Batsman to start his career in the early 00s, after a certain Virender Sehwag. It's perfectly understandable to think the contrary and most people do so.
Sanga is better than Sehwag when it comes to test cricket. Averages 50 both in and out of the sub continentIf you misinterpreted my statement, What I meant is IMO, Sanga is the second best Batsman to start his career in the early 00s, after a certain Virender Sehwag. It's perfectly understandable to think the contrary and most people do so.
Cricket is about being effective isn't it?Most effective is more or less the same as best, right?Personally, might refer to Sehwag as the most effective, rather than "best".
That is also a match winning ability.I don't think it is unreasonable to have the opposite opinion though, considering Sehwag's unique match-winning abilities combined with a fantastic average.
Probably fair to say Sanga's the better all-round, all-conditions batsman to have in your team, though.
Given that cricket is about winning matches, I think Id much rather take the better match winner. Its also the reason why Id pick Lara over Tendulkar.Sanga is a better batsman,Sehwag is a better match winner.
only after he scores centuries in england, south africa and west indiesSanga clearly ranks in the company of Kallis and Dravid.
SL playes turned down a tour of England for the IPL....Hmm, he certainly doesn't get the chances to do so that other teams do, with SL's rough end of the FTP.
Sad... They can't grow as a team if no-one wants to play for them...SL playes turned down a tour of England for the IPL....
It was a last minute tour after England didn't want to play Zimbabwe.SL playes turned down a tour of England for the IPL....