aussie
Hall of Fame Member
Not that big, it depends on what conditions they bowl in IMO.Bollinger >>>>>Johnson and I can tell you that after one test.
Not that big, it depends on what conditions they bowl in IMO.Bollinger >>>>>Johnson and I can tell you that after one test.
Midge Johnson would be a more convincing opener.He's more convincing as an opener than Watson IMO.
Dougeh!Bollinger >>>>>Johnson and I can tell you that after one test.
What did he do wrong at the Gabba?Time to go Huss.
The last 2 Test have added on to a painful 18 months.
On point. Some tough decisions have to be made on what roles North, Hussey & Watson have to do for real. Based on this looking ahead to Ashes next year the team then should probably be:I'm happy to admit he made runs at the Gabba - infact, I'd love to see him make a heap of runs cause I think he is a qualty player and even better bloke.
But to me, and it could just be a gut feeling, the way he has been making the runs in Test cricket suggests he is no longer sure of himself as a player in the longer form of the game. Plus, it's not to say he isn't in the top 6 bats in the country, but we do need to make a call on who will open long term for the next Ashes etc. and beyond. The time is now to make that call realistically.
Put it this way - we need to make a tough decision on who out of Hussey, Watson and North play next summer now so we have some preparation. In my opinion (and I'm happy to preface this by saying it is opinion only) I can't see all 3 making the Ashes to be honest, as Watson needs to bat in the middle order - the way the side is balanced now, his bowling is crucial so we need him to be just as fit for that as batting. North has more credit than Hussey and looks a more certain Test cricketer at this stage.
I reckon Hussey is a ripper fella and I would love to see him succeed. But I just can't see him making the runs we need in the middle order over the next 18 months. Watson has also become so valuable that he needs to bat in the middle.
We need to make a long-term call on who Katich's opening partner will be with the next 2 years in mind. I just don't see Hussey being around much longer to be honest.
All of whom have a far more pressing case for opening than Watson does.With Watto moving down the order (hypothetically) Australia have quite a few opening candidates don't they? Hughes, Jaques and Rogers?
I really don't think an extra 30 minutes would have made the difference, at the end of the day.If Gayle had declared at around 300 or were bowled out for around that; there was a decent opportunity for victory there. Even at 330 it wasn't impossible.
Might as well replace Krejza with Hauritz and call them NSW.On point. Some tough decisions have to be made on what roles North, Hussey & Watson have to do for real. Based on this looking ahead to Ashes next year the team then should probably be:
Jaques
Hughes
Ponting
Katich
Clarke
Watson
Haddin
Johnson
Krejza
Siddle
Hilfenhaus
Katich is really the best man to go @ 4 tbf if Hussey does get dropped. His versatility is superb, i dont think it would affect his game on ioata if he suddenly went back into the middle-order. Dont want to move Clarke from # 5 either.
Watson safest position as all-rounder is @ 6 in this hectic modern day scheduling, plus with is injury record. Thus North will have to be "Hodged" regardless of his good start. Watto has the potential to bat @ 4 one day though.
Plus a natural opening pair & yes i prefer Krejza to Hauritz in tests.
Because that makes sense...Might as well replace Krejza with Hauritz and call them NSW.
That is exactly the team I would be playing, very in favour of the move of katich to 4. (except the top 7 all being from NSW is quite disconcerting). Massive props for that post.On point. Some tough decisions have to be made on what roles North, Hussey & Watson have to do for real. Based on this looking ahead to Ashes next year the team then should probably be:
Jaques
Hughes
Ponting
Katich
Clarke
Watson
Haddin
Johnson
Krejza
Siddle
Hilfenhaus
Katich is really the best man to go @ 4 tbf if Hussey does get dropped. His versatility is superb, i dont think it would affect his game on ioata if he suddenly went back into the middle-order. Dont want to move Clarke from # 5 either.
Watson safest position as all-rounder is @ 6 in this hectic modern day scheduling, plus with is injury record. Thus North will have to be "Hodged" regardless of his good start. Watto has the potential to bat @ 4 one day though.
Plus a natural opening pair & yes i prefer Krejza to Hauritz in tests.
I know he didn't take wickets, but I actually thought he bowled well - one of the better spells from a finger spinner that went without reward.Because that makes sense...
How do people think Hauritz performed on what was a turning track?