No, sorry. You bang on about Gerrard being overrated, but Fredinand is equally as beloved of certain corners of the press and, without fail, he'll allow a chance every game because he still switches off at his age. People drone on about him because he's comfortable on the ball and is quick once he gets going, but I'd take Carragher and Ledley King over him as centre-halves any day.Carragher is crap on the ball regardless. Gave it away for fun when he played for England.
While Carragher might be better in some aspects of defending Rio more than makes up for it in strength, in the air, pace etc.
Why do you think a succession of England managers haven't? Serious question.I'd take Carragher and Ledley King over him as centre-halves any day.
Total Joke. Not including Carragher just for the sake of your argument. You know fully well that he is a better defender than Bramble.Vidic
Ferdinand
Terry
Skrtel
Carvalho
Alex
Jagielka
Gallas
Hangeland
Bramble/Woodgate/King
Going by just central defenders. People like Corluka, Evra, Bosingwa and Cole edge in there when considering fullbacks.
Yeah I agree with this, unlike some on this forum I would always take Ferdinand over Charragher.Personally I reckon the "Ferdinand loses concentration a lot" idea is a few years old - yeah he can have his lapses like any defender, but I think because he used to have quite a rep for it any mistake he makes now is Rio "losing concentration again" when IMO he's more solid and consistent than most these days. The fact that he's quite a smooth player as opposed a typical English bulldog type like Carragher probably adds to that perception too I think.
I would also say that the mention of Titus Bramble before Kolo Toure, Joleon Lescott, Joseph Yobo, Daniel Agger, Richard Dunne, and several others is also highly dubious.Total Joke. Not including Carragher just for the sake of your argument. You know fully well that he is a better defender than Bramble.
Never actually been a huge fan of him myself, never considered him to be very top class but he is a very solid defender and you cannot dispute that.
I would as well, I think Ferdinand brings a very solid presence to the back line which none of the other options really provide. That said, I do think, in terms of out and out defensive abilities, Carragher is better.Yeah I agree with this, unlike some on this forum I would always take Ferdinand over Charragher.
Is a more complete allround player for mine, cuts a more commanding figure to opposing sides as well I would suggest. Also I think the politics of football might have some bearing, leaving out a £30million player who forms one of the most solid and tight defensive partnerships in the country would be a truly unprecedented move, ont to mention the fact that he has always done a decent job for England.Why do you think a succession of England managers haven't? Serious question.
If you're including fullbacks it would be ludicrous to leave out arguably the best set in the Premiership.Vidic
Ferdinand
Terry
Skrtel
Carvalho
Alex
Jagielka
Gallas
Hangeland
Bramble/Woodgate/King
Going by just central defenders. People like Corluka, Evra, Bosingwa and Cole edge in there when considering fullbacks.
Just named some off the top of my head. Clichy gone off it a bit though hasn't he?If you're including fullbacks it would be ludicrous to leave out arguably the best set in the Premiership.
Massive heh @ Jagielka and the the last 4 you have there.