Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
The perception is based on how they bat, and where they're from. If Bell or Bopara were northern (Bell may not be a southerner but he's a midlander) they'd not be called soft. Mostly in cricket, "soft" is bandied around as a stereotype by people who don't have a clue what they're on about. To get it, all a player requires is a) not being a northerner and b) having a non-awkward-looking technique. Pretty much any batsman who has both of those will get branded soft by a large number of England cricket fans. No insight into their pysche is ever attained by said branders, it's purely a cosmetic perception.The 'softy' thing has nothing to do with them being either southern or batsmen Richard, it's just a perception of their mental strength, whether right or wrong. Bell is barely even a southerner anyway
As a bowler it makes far less difference and is based more on how they bowl (if they don't bowl enough short stuff being one such case) than area of origin.
I'd say a fairly strong second after learning to hit the ball down. It's bad enough having one glaring fault without having another pretty bad one to go with it.Yeah, he's had two shockers, but why is that? Because he always looks so likely to get out lbw. I'd personally say that needs to be his first priority.