ouchTim de Lisle said:A left-arm seamer who sprays it around, a wholehearted swinger who bowls tidy long spells, a quick with decent pace but not many wickets to show for it, and an amiable finger spinner who likes to pitch well outside off: yes, after searching long and hard, Australia have finally found their answer to Alan Mullally, Martin Bicknell, Devon Malcolm and Robert Croft.
Should come up with stuff like this once the series is over, if Australia win the remaining two tests all this ends up looking pretty stupid.
Nah. It holds true as at this point. It is good fun, nothing more.Should come up with stuff like this once the series is over, if Australia win the remaining two tests all this ends up looking pretty stupid.
Get your kicks in while you can, is the theory here I reckon.Should come up with stuff like this once the series is over, if Australia win the remaining two tests all this ends up looking pretty stupid.
Like McGrath's pre-series prediction of 5-0 in favor of Australia and Clarke's assertion that this squad is as good as any other squad which toured England before.Should come up with stuff like this once the series is over, if Australia win the remaining two tests all this ends up looking pretty stupid.
I am amazed at English fans ability to wipe out the 2006/07 series. Its like you have erased it from your memory or it is the "the series who must not be named" . Listening/reading English commentators and they mentioned the 2005 series 2634235372645 times more than the more recent series.Like McGrath's pre-series prediction of 5-0 in favor of Australia and Clarke's assertion that this squad is as good as any other squad which toured England before.
I am talking about the present Ashes series. McGrath and Clarke said their piece on the 2009 Ashes series only. and for your information, England are 1-0 up in this series. It is you who is living in the past mate.I am amazed at English fans ability to wipe out the 2006/07 series. Its like you have erased it from your memory or it is the "the series who must not be named" . Listening/reading English commentators and they mentioned the 2005 series 2634235372645 times more than the more recent series.
Australia did beat England 5-0. McGrath's premonition was just 18 months early.
You do realise that if Australia win at Headingley then Australia is in the box seat to retain the Ashes. Remember, Australia doesnt have to win the series. Or are you still under the impression England are the current holders of the Ashes because you wiped the 2006/07 series from your memory?
I haven't heard McGrath make many comments on the current series. He has bigger issues on his mind.I am talking about the present Ashes series. McGrath and Clarke said their piece on the 2009 Ashes series only. and for your information, England are 1-0 up in this series. It is you who is living in the past mate.
What else do you expect them to say...?Like McGrath's pre-series prediction of 5-0 in favor of Australia and Clarke's assertion that this squad is as good as any other squad which toured England before.
Well, what else do you expect an English scribe to say then?What else do you expect them to say...?
Obviously McGrath wants his side to win all the games they play in, and as the vice-captain of the side you don't expect Clarke to say anything else then what he said about his squad.
Though all that is hardly comparable to what a journalist says in the middle of a hard contested series, which still could go either way, because if Australia win the series from here, this same bloke would be going gaga all over them.
Yeah exactly - it's a pretty limited window of opportunity, so let's take advantage of itGet your kicks in while you can, is the theory here I reckon.
So AWTA.FFS, learn to laugh once in a while. It keeps you healthy.
NO-ONE CARESMeh, I remember in 2005 when it was 1-0 to the Aussies there were all sorts of jokes flying around. Think there was a thread of them in fact, which Scaly dug at the end. Might find it.