True in a way... but I think Watson's not the only one who's let Ponting down today.Considering they were referring to Watson as the player that let Ponting down today, that doesn't fly.
He shouldn't be in the side, but do remember that he is only 23. He's about 6 months younger than Siddle was when he made his test debut. So I think he has the capacity to get better and be a good test player in the somewhat near future.It's so so painful to listen to when the comms start talking about Broad. He's bowled absolute pies all series, how they can keep justifying his selection with "he has to come good, surely!" is absolutely mystifying.
But Strauss doesn't use him as a 5th bowler, he has far too much (unfounded) faith in.Because we have a 5-man attack which means the batting of our fifth bowler is more important. And because he's a fifth bowler his bowling is less important that that of the Aussies fourth.
But siddle was effective almost straight away, Broad's had 20 matches to do something and his returns seem to be getting even worse.He shouldn't be in the side, but do remember that he is only 23. He's about 6 months younger than when Siddle was when he made his test debut. So I think he has the capacity to get better and be a good test player in the somewhat near future.
There is more justification for Hauritz playing test cricket than Durham being a test venueGrrr figures just come back and Hauritz flukes a decent delivery.
If it means we bowl them out quick, I'll make you Eggs Benedict mate.Last ball before leaving for breakfast was Prior geting out. First ball back was Flintoff. Either Im bad luck, need to eat longer meals or both
You've got to have some faith in your bowlers, no point at all pulling them out of the attack straight away every time they're not going too well. I think Broad bowled well in the first innings at Lords. And in this first innings he was definitely used as the fourth seamer.But Strauss doesn't use him as a 5th bowler, he has far too much (unfounded) faith in.
Totally bizarre thatBut Strauss doesn't use him as a 5th bowler, he has far too much (unfounded) faith in.
Yes no doubt, but my point is that he has played 20 tests at a very young age, so it's not much of a surprise that he hasn't been that effective. If Siddle or Johnson had been selected at 21 and given a long run in the side I'd expect their career stats would look pretty bad too. I'm not saying that Broad should've been selected over the last 2 years because in my mind he clearly shouldn't have been, only that to say that he is obviously crap and should never play again based on what he has done so far is to forget how young he is and that he could be a lot better and a good player in the future.But siddle was effective almost straight away, Broad's had 20 matches to do something and his returns seem to be getting even worse.
Ouch, that wont be a popular comment on here.terrible sportsmanship by freddie, just walk when you're out champ.....