wfdu_ben91
International 12th Man
England won by 119 runs...I wonder how this match would have resulted if the umpires got some of the decisions right.
52 (Hughes) + 44 (Katich) + 53 (Hussey) = 149 runs
Australia by 30...
England won by 119 runs...I wonder how this match would have resulted if the umpires got some of the decisions right.
True this. Our luck was especially there in 85, when Simon O'Donnell played int he Lord's Test.Oh yes!!!
Brilliant, kept our heads. Sure, we've had a bit of luck, but I'm sure the Aussies have had a bit at some point in the last 75 years too. Fantastic game, brilliant comeback from our guys after last week, and top effort from the Aussies to make us so scared during this run-chase. Bring on Edgbaston.
Ponting was out... I hate to tell you...Katich and Ponting in the first innings.
Hughes and Hussey in the second innings.
I thought there was another one as well. Hughes first innings dismissal was questionable, IMO.
Would have certainly lost without Strauss, IMO (or drawn anyways). Am 80% sure you guys would have won without Flintoff this morning. Don't get me wrong, Fred was superb, but it's Strauss's match.Well, personally I think we'd of lost and you'd have made history without Freddie. We'll never know though. This pitch does get awfully flat as the match goes along.
LOL, you're forgetting that all 3 had made runs already. England won by 115 btw not 119.England won by 119 runs...
52 (Hughes) + 44 (Katich) + 53 (Hussey) = 149 runs
Australia by 30...
He may have been out LBW, but was given out caught. The third umpire could only say whether it was a catch or not. He should be allowed to say that he didn't get any bat on it.Ponting was out... I hate to tell you...
Hughes wouldnt have scored many anyway...
Would have certainly lost without Strauss, IMO (or drawn anyways). Am 80% sure you guys would have won without Flintoff this morning. Don't get me wrong, Fred was superb, but it's Strauss's match.
Fairly consistently bitter stuff from you in this Test ben.Flintoff bowling high full tosses and batsman not picking it up again. Same thing happened to Kallis.
Takes the new balls out, apparently.What does the 4th umpire do? Is he there in case one of the others dies?
Brings out the Cricket balls if a change of ball is needed.What does the 4th umpire do? Is he there in case one of the others dies?
Got Russ into the comm. box, fine effort.Haha, applause for Jeff Crowe. What did he do in the last five days?
It's been said before.He may have been out LBW, but was given out caught. The third umpire could only say whether it was a catch or not. He should be allowed to say that he didn't get any bat on it.
I reckon it could have slipped down the leg side. Oh no, wait, we have to trust Hawkeye. Hawkeye said it was hitting leg, it must be out.