He isn't btw.Has some remarkable Precambrian similiarities FTR, not that that neccessarily means anything.
2005 had Old Trafford and Trent Bridge and the scheduling wasn't dominated by greedy money sucking.Elated and England's start but the pitches could really ruin this series.
Having said that... 2005 had flat decks but the bowling from both sides was in a different class.
Headingley was excluded, so it clearly was.2005 had Old Trafford and Trent Bridge and the scheduling wasn't dominated by greedy money sucking.
This year's schedule is far more money orientated though. Especially with these pitches made for 5 day tests so they could generate more monies.Headingley was excluded, so it clearly was.
What's more, the 2005 scheduling removed Lord's from its Second Test slot, so clearly everything was completely wrong with it.
By no means is defeatist, we won't lose this. If we were batting first then Phillip Hughes probably would've shattered the record for the fastest Test century in history by now, tbh. I mean who is going to get us out? Anderson? Broad? Onions? A one-leggered Flintoff?I love a defeatist Aussie
Yeah, one positive from a pitch like this is that my 4th and 5th day tickets should mean seeing two whole days' cricket. It might even mean seeing two whole wickets fall.This year's schedule is far more money orientated though. Especially with these pitches made for 5 day tests so they could generate more monies.