Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
On slow flat wickets you need bowlers capable of bowling on them - which numbers not very many.The thing is you don't know what the ball, the wicket or the weather is going to do before the match starts so if you think it's going to swing at a particular ground and with rain around and a damp outfield and there is no swing or even if the ball doesn't swing with the sun out, you have 4 swing bowlers. Variety covers all possibilities with so many slow flat wickets around these days.
It's not really possible to get no swing, unless the ball is of crap quality. Good swing bowlers take almost everything out of the equation. And you can always have a pretty good idea of what the pitch, ball etc. are going to play like, even if you clearly can never be certain.
Hoggard didn't develop said skills by bowling in matches. No, he developed them with one hell of a lot of hard work in the nets. Until someone is capable of bowling in certain conditions, in my view it's a mistake to pick them in said conditions.Also by chopping and changing the attack you won't have your bowlers learning to bowl on all types of wickets. If we had kept Hoggard just for games where we thought there was swing he wouldn't have developed into a bowler who could bowl anywhere.
Yes, but apart from Flintoff all were effective in fewer matches than they were ineffective. No-one had more than three good games out of five.The fast bowlers in 2005 took roughly the same amount of wickets and their strike rates were 34.0, 48.5, 45.8 and 56.8.