zaremba
Cricketer Of The Year
You'll have to ask Mrs Z about that. But please don't mention the drugs.in what way?
You'll have to ask Mrs Z about that. But please don't mention the drugs.in what way?
hmmm - thinking I might just pass on that one .................. for both our sakesYou'll have to ask Mrs Z about that. But please don't mention the drugs.
A pretty ghastly thought as far as I'm concerned. Not so much about the lack of hype (although I do enjoy the hype to a degree) but the lack of coverage. Football is a good game and I do follow it but its dominance over cricket in England is a ****ing travesty. As you say the non-coincidence of Ashes and WCs has meant that generally speaking the cricket can dominate the back pages, unless of course Carlisle United signed a reserve team goalkeeper the day before.I sometimes wonder what would happen if the Ashes were played in a (football) World Cup year, which has never happened although it's clashed with the Olympics a few times. Would result in a huge downsizing of the hype surely.
Matthew Engel still, regularly, points-out the negatives of the fact that, since the increased international schedule in 2000 (which has gotten steadily more absurd year by year), we've lost the predictability and balance between overdoing and underdoing which used to adorn tours to England, especially by Australia.Yeah the '05 series started stupidly late, didn't it - almost two weeks later than this one (which is still too late for those of us who got used to series starting in June, but that's another matter).
Yeah the Twenty20 World thingy I think has been pretty big in importance, for me. IE, I basically had 2 whole weeks where I barely had any international cricket to take any interest in.There has been a fair old build-up, but the T20 WC distracted from it for a while.
Aye - hence the deliberate scheduling that's deliberately avoided that!I sometimes wonder what would happen if the Ashes were played in a (football) World Cup year, which has never happened although it's clashed with the Olympics a few times. Would result in a huge downsizing of the hype surely.
And Summer Olympics, I suppose.Ashes have been in odd-numbered years since 1972, making sure always to avoid European Championships and World Cups since the true globalisation of the TV market.
Ashes have been in odd-numbered years since 1972, making sure always to avoid European Championships and World Cups since the true globalisation of the TV market.
2009
2006/07
2005
2002/03
2001
1998/99
1997
1994/95
1993
1990/91
1989
1986/87
1985
1982/83
1981
(1978/79)
1977
1975
1974/75
1972
1970/71
1968
1965/66
1964
1962/63
1961
1958/59
1956
1954/55
1953
1950/51
1948
1946/47
1938
1936/37
1934
1932/33
1930
1928/29
1926
1924/25
1921
1920/21
Thanks to Richard's research, I can state that the Ashes did actually take place during the first 3 football world cups, in 1930, 1934 & 1938. Not that any of them were televised of course. Nor did we deign to take place in any of them. Nonetheless ...I sometimes wonder what would happen if the Ashes were played in a (football) World Cup year, which has never happened although it's clashed with the Olympics a few times. Would result in a huge downsizing of the hype surely.
Ha, think we're running 0/3 when there's an Ashes/WC clash, so probably just as well they're separated.Thanks to Richard's research, I can state that the Ashes did actually take place during the first 3 football world cups, in 1930, 1934 & 1938. Not that any of them were televised of course. Nor did we deign to take place in any of them. Nonetheless ...
A Yorkie?Incidentally nerd points to anyone who can name the only player to go to a football world cup and appear in an Ashes series.
Willie Watson.
He is, yes. & PF has the very chap. Cricinfo profile.A Yorkie?