Yeah, have never understood their fascination with Lambert. One of life's mysteries.Even if this was the logic, though, why would Lambert play given he was batting #9? Not doubting you FTR; just think it's really weird.
Agreed.Then the Cricinfo guys are on drugs. They explicitly said it showed the Haddin ball just missing. Pretty poor, people trust them to get this stuff right.
Geeves you say? That is awesome!Well who did you expect them to pick? I don't really rate Geeves either but I can't really think of anyone else I'd be particularly comfortable with other than Bracken and Noffke who have been blacklisted.
Well when Lee, Clark, Bollinger, Noffke and Bracken are all injured, it doesn't leave one with a lot of choices for your 4th specialist quick. As I said, I don't really rate him, but he is better than the alternatives.Geeves you say? That is awesome!
Glad he's made it, pretty sure the selectors liked his recent 99's and want to strengthen the batting lineup, haha.
So funny to read you Prince defending him after I was calling for his selection recently and you rubbishing him.
Also injured like every other Vic quick.Obviously can't play Pattinson; he's English. Hopes is not a better bowler than Geeves.
Dirk Nannes unlucky to not get a mention. Guess he's been injured lately too.Well when Lee, Clark, Bollinger, Noffke and Bracken are all injured, it doesn't leave one with a lot of choices for your 4th specialist quick. As I said, I don't really rate him, but he is better than the alternatives.
I think he'd be pretty useful in a five-man attack. Picking him in a four-man attack would be mad.No Tait? I hear he's really quick.
Please tell me he's gone for good this time...Sorry your majesty....
zPlease tell me he's gone for good this time...
Haha, Ponting.Aussies still batting.