_Ed_
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah, that's a pretty big point.Australia - 23 extras, including more than 10 wides.
NZ - 2 extras.
Yeah, that's a pretty big point.Australia - 23 extras, including more than 10 wides.
NZ - 2 extras.
After tonight, it's 6-5 to NZ.how many has each team won ??
Worse than Collingwood on Elliot?Haddin - cheat.
Probably worse than Clarke last year.
Well the Collingwood incident wasn't cheating. But it was incredibly poor sportsmanship. But it wasn't against the rules, what Haddin did is.Worse than Collingwood on Elliot?
I love karma though.
6-5 NZ in the CH iirc they* were talking about it at the start of the match. (1 washout as well)how many has each team won ??
Yeah but Haddin could get some benefit of doubt from some quarters, as could have Clarke. Collingwood was basically asked by the umpire, "are you going to be a wanker?" and he replied, "yup".Well the Collingwood incident wasn't cheating. But it was incredibly poor sportsmanship. But it wasn't against the rules, what Haddin did is.
Yeah but Haddin could get some benefit of doubt from some quarters, as could have Clarke. Collingwood was basically asked by the umpire, "are you going to be a wanker?" and he replied, "yup".
Yep 6-5 to us in CH.6-5 NZ in the CH iirc they* were talking about it at the start of the match. (1 washout as well)
*They being from C9 so don't blame me if it's wrong.
It still doesnt make what Collingwood did cheating (not that I condone it in anyway, I think it was terrible). What Haddin did is AGAINST the rules, so IMO, it is worse. Oh, and Haddin knew what had happened, how could he possibly not? Plus if you look after he celebrates at first, he has a bit of a double take where you can see he is thinking "Hang on a minute..." but then he just continues on with the celebrations.Yeah but Haddin could get some benefit of doubt from some quarters, as could have Clarke. Collingwood was basically asked by the umpire, "are you going to be a wanker?" and he replied, "yup".
And I went to that game, so it doesn't count. They were never going to win that.NZ have also only won chasing too and only lost one match when put in to bowl first.
Agree with this.David Hussey's spot must be under some pressure, and I'm sure Dave Warner is not far behind him. Of the bowlers, perhaps Tait is most under pressure. With 5 losses from 6 games these players' positions should be under pressure.
Yeah but Haddin could get some benefit of doubt from some quarters, as could have Clarke. Collingwood was basically asked by the umpire, "are you going to be a wanker?" and he replied, "yup".
Haddin's appeal was what caused more ire than his actual error.
That's true. You did handle Patel better than I was expecting though, was quite impressed by the sixes hit off his bowling.One positive for Australia would be the bowling performance of MJ, the state of the match helped him with the figures, however hopefully he regains some confidence. He chipped in well with the bat too, gave us a chance.
We needed to get more from Vettori's bowling, spin a real Achilles heal ATM.
Agree. If Haddin had done that to me, he would have been missing a few teeth.Have to congratulate Broom on how he handled the Haddin incident. You could see that he had a fair idea what had happened, but he didn't make a scene.
Maybe he should have.