How many temporary bans...

[Uppercut]

Haven't seen an account of his for over a year or so now.

Or have you?

 

[Sanz]

It is funny to see some people taking piss at others when all they have to their credit is 70000 posts of dog****.

 

[vic_orthdox]

It is funny to see some people taking piss at others when all they have to their credit is 70000 posts of dog****.

That sort of denigration is not required, Sanz. Please refrain from such posts.

 

[Sanz]

That sort of denigration is not required, Sanz. Please refrain from such posts.

I am sorry about that, but what right does the poster in question have to denigrate other posters when they are not really around to post ? He has an opinion about pretty much everyone on this forum and he is allowed to post it over and over again. If he is allowed to say anything about almost anyone, then I guess it is only fair that he gets to hear what other people think of his own contribution on this forum.

 

[PhoenixFire]

I am sorry about that, but what right does the poster in question have to denigrate other posters when they are not really around to post ? He has an opinion about pretty much everyone on this forum and he is allowed to post it over and over again. If he is allowed to say anything about almost anyone, then I guess it is only fair that he gets to hear what other people think of his own contribution on this forum.

Well considering he has been banned 3 (IIRC) times, I wouldn't say that he has 'got away' with anything that other posters wouldn't have.

 

[grecian]

Well considering he has been banned 3 (IIRC) times, I wouldn't say that he has 'got away' with anything that other posters wouldn't have.

Well that your opinion obviously, many of us think he should of been banned on many other occasions. That is just my opinion, and as Sanz said Dicko gives his opinion on whether other people should be banned frequently, so I have no compunction giving mine, about him. At least I don't claim to have inside info every time I do it (mainly because it'll be erroneous), does Dicko get this inside info, and who does he get it from? Surely the bans should increase as they go by anyway, a week is nothing even for Richard, and he then makes up for it by posting 1000s a day.

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

Well that your opinion obviously, many of us think he should of been banned on many other occasions. That is just my opinion, and as Sanz said Dicko gives his opinion on whether other people should be banned frequently, so I have no compunction giving mine, about him. At least I don't claim to have inside info every time I do it (mainly because it'll be erroneous), does Dicko get this inside info, and who does he get it from? Surely the bans should increase as they go by anyway, a week is nothing even for Richard, and he then makes up for it by posting 1000s a day.

If you have a complaint, rather than responding on the thread, please e-mail heef @ cantbe****ed.com

We will respond to your complaint when it suits us.

 

[grecian]

Just sticking up for Sanz, poor bloke just getting bullied, IMHO........

 

[GIMH]

I am sorry about that, but what right does the poster in question have to denigrate other posters when they are not really around to post ? He has an opinion about pretty much everyone on this forum and he is allowed to post it over and over again. If he is allowed to say anything about almost anyone, then I guess it is only fair that he gets to hear what other people think of his own contribution on this forum.

Wow !! Well I am just disappointed that Sledger's ban is for 6 months only. Rest of the two would come back and hopefully bit reformed.

http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/showpost.php?p=1764350&postcount=33

Ind33d

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

Just sticking up for Sanz, poor bloke just getting bullied, IMHO........

Your complaint has been considered. You are now banned for 7 days.

N.B. Heef's Heavy Handed Moderation service is available for hire at cheap discount rates. Call Now! 0800 HEEFAH

 

[Sanz]

http://www.cricketweb.net/forum/showpost.php?p=1764350&postcount=33

Ind33d

Huh and there was no comments about Sledger but my own disappointment that it was only for 6 months.

Edit :- Now remember the post, It was slight tongue in check (take a look at the only being in Grey) as well depending on the hard time he gave me during his last stay on the forum. I reported almost all his posts for baiting me.

 

[Sanz]

Well considering he has been banned 3 (IIRC) times, I wouldn't say that he has 'got away' with anything that other posters wouldn't have.

The point is he posted this in this thread.

You... are... kidding?

Recalls your failure to notice that onemangang\sheerindianspeed\nehrafan\wahindiawah was in fact not merely an idiot of the highest order but the most notorious d00plicater of all-time on CW.

Are you familiar with ajaagarkarajaaja AKA cozmiccoyoete AKA GladiatrsInBlue AKA hindmaatujesalam AKA jaspalsinghrana AKA mayadevi AKA muralilal AKA nehrafan AKA onemangang AKA sheerindianspeed AKA vandemataram AKA wahindiawah AKA yohanna AKA IndianByHeart AKA step_hen_hicks AKA yum yum AKA king AKA Choora AKA AndIndiawins AKA BlueGladiators AKA IndianSpirit AKA tasso AKA highforties then? If not, I guess I could forgive those sentiments.

 

[grecian]

Your complaint has been considered. You are now banned for 7 days.

Would be interesting anyway, never been banned from a forum before, novelty factor could make it worth it

 

[GIMH]

Huh and there was no comments about Sledger but my own disappointment that it was only for 6 months..It was slight tongue in check as well depending on the hard time he give me on the forum.

Yeah, tongue-in-cheek, of course

 

[Sanz]

Yeah, tongue-in-cheek, of course

Even if you feel it was not, it doesn't attack Sledger in any way and only shows my disappointment.

 

[GIMH]

So wishing he was banned for longer than 6 months isn't attacking him? ITSTL

Do what you want, but there is a pot-kettle-black about your comments to Richard

 

[Uppercut]

While we're slinging mud, Sanz showed some fantastic slipperiness to escape a ban for some of his anti-Pakistan rants on the back of the Mumbai incident.

 

[GIMH]

oh, he went there....

 

[Sanz]

So wishing he was banned for longer than 6 months isn't attacking him? ITSTL

No. If anything it denigrates me for thinking like that and my own inability to handle a bait on the internet.

Do what you want, but there is a pot-kettle-black about your comments to Richard

There might be on other occasions but not in the post you quoted. Besides, when I do so I get called out by forum members too.

 

[GIMH]

If saying that denigrates you, then what Rich said denigrates him, just make your mind up, that's all