Good riddance to you, I'll look forward to not having to read your attempts at criticism of me. If, on the other hand, you still try it, we'll all know you're not using ignore-lists for what they're designed for.I feel terribly sorry for you, but the sheer stupidity of your posts, you utter lack of a sense of humour and the fact that I just found out about the ignore user feature () means that I'm afraid you're being plonked. I deeply admire the resilience and patience of those who read your posts and take you seriously.
No they wouldn't as he was clearly of little use in 2007/08, and MacGill's figures flatter him about as much as any player's in history do and only the most simplistic judge a player by his career average alone.In other news: Stuart MacGill played 44 tests, had an average below 30, a tremendous strike rate (better than Warne's), was definitely test standard, and CA would give an arm and a leg to haul him out of retirement.
Don't know about the worst - New Zealand, West Indies, Pakistan and even sometimes Australia and South Africa have all had plenty of poor players of spin in that time.TBH, I was exaggerating to prove a point, but the idea still stands, that out of all the sides in the world over the past 20 years, England have probably been the worst players of spin in the world.
What? You're giving him 700+ wickets? There are a lot of things other than injury or retirement that can keep a bowler from taking 700 wickets.I've got a feeling he might end up as the all-time highest wicket taker by the time he's done, barring injury or early retirement.
Just a prediction SS.What? You're giving him 700+ wickets? There are a lot of things other than injury or retirement that can keep a bowler from taking 700 wickets.
That's pretty much stupid TBH. World class? Probably not. To say though that he's not Test standard boggles the mind.Stuart MacGill wasn't that far from being Test-standard,
Heh they dont even have the fallback of insinuating he's a pegger. Would kill Heals tbh.The Channel 9 commentary team.
I would back the current indian lot to do well against him but once the likes of Dravid and Tendulkar goes then I don't have all that confidence in the likes of Yuvrajs, raina's or the sharma's in handling Mendis.Australia, South Africa and India are the only three teams likely to have any sort of upper-hand over Mendis and that too when each of them play him in their own backyards, facing Mendis in Sri Lanka would be tough task for every team.
They didn't though, did they? Dravid didn't have a clue whilst Sachin was still asking for referrals after being caught stone dead or leathering the ball into the close fielder’s hands. Only Sehwag and Gautam looked good against him. Apparently according to Dhoni, the Indian players were able to read/pick him but that didn’t stop Mendis breaking Alec Bedser’s record...I would back the current indian lot to do well against him but once the likes of Dravid and Tendulkar goes then I don't have all that confidence in the likes of Yuvrajs, raina's or the sharma's in handling Mendis.
The most overrated cricketer in the world by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarAll this Mendis love is premature.
haha...yeah I should have mentioned that I was speaking in terms of if a series is being played in India.They didn't though, did they? Dravid didn't have a clue whilst Sachin was still asking for referrals after being caught stone dead or leathering the ball into the close fielder’s hands. Only Sehwag and Gautam looked good against him. Apparently according to Dhoni, the Indian players were able to read/pick him but that didn’t stop Mendis breaking Alec Bedser’s record...
Don't now much about guys like Pujara, Badri or Kohli since I havent seen them bat but if you are talking about players like Rohit Sharma or Suresh Raina then I am afraid I would have to disagree with you.If anything, I'd back the younger lot of Indian batsmen (Yuvraj excepted) to do better against Mendis than an ageing Sachin/Dravid/Ganguly.
Hype is justified imo.The most overrated cricketer in the world by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar
Of course. But I don't see how it's an unreasonable prediction in Mendis' case. India and Bangladesh have been completely clueless against him, and he does bowl extremely accurately and has infinite variations. He debuted at around the same age as Warne when he debuted, and given the packed test schedule coming up, I think his career might follow the same path as Murali's, except there's every indication he might be even more successful. Let's not forget: even Sri Lankans had trouble picking him, and I imagine he gave them every clue possible.What? You're giving him 700+ wickets? There are a lot of things other than injury or retirement that can keep a bowler from taking 700 wickets.
Yeah, I'm sure you believe Hauritz > Mendis.The most overrated cricketer in the world by faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar