Richard Direnson.Also annoys me that you blame me as if I'd invented the damn thing (ie, the abysmal pun). Obviously, I did nothing of the sort.
And TBH, I didn't watch so much as one single ball of that O'Diren not-so-dire batting in the second-innings. Had I done so, I might quite possibly have not criticised his batting to any great degree.
Anyway, you won't get far with me by punning names of players.![]()
Yet you are the person STILL using the derogatory nickname for him.Also annoys me that you blame me as if I'd invented the damn thing (ie, the abysmal pun). Obviously, I did nothing of the sort.
And TBH, I didn't watch so much as one single ball of that O'Diren not-so-dire batting in the second-innings. Had I done so, I might quite possibly have not criticised his batting to any great degree.
Anyway, you won't get far with me by punning names of players.![]()
Anyone remember Alan Mullaly and his potential world record in the Ashes quite a few back? Came out and hit a couple of fours in a 14 IIRC. Was one of the most entertaining innings by a tailender I've ever seen![]()
http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/england/content/story/303300.htmlIt is The Oval, 1996; the third Test against Pakistan; the England coach David Lloyd again. "I made Alan a bet. I said: 'You get 30 and I'll buy you 30 pints of Guinness. That's a promise.' Now, he wasn't a big drinker but he took it on."
Remarkably, against Wasim and Waqar, Mullally started to score - quickly, too. Within a quarter of an hour he had hit five boundaries and made 24. "It was then that he gestured to the dressing room," remembers Lloyd. "He made a drinking-a-pint sign with his hand. I even heard him shout to me, 'Get 'em in!'"
That was enough for Wasim Akram, who promptly knocked out Mullally's poles, with the hero six short of an unlikely prize. He got so close.
Did Lloyd pay out anyway? "No. Of course not."
Great article. The thing is, I remember Mullally smacking McGrath around in one glorious innings of 20 odd. Tufnell never did that and could never be that. Tufnell wins.
Ah, Dean Headley! The Simon Jones of the late nineties.
That was the match I had in mindRemember this match?
The commentators were screaming, "Nel needs to get a single! Get Boucher on strike if South Africa are to have any chance of stealing this one!"
Then Nel hit consecutive cover drives for four and won them the match with a single. All off the last three balls of the innings.
I remember watching that Test, was very impressive bowling.Ah, Dean Headley! The Simon Jones of the late nineties.
I think the statistic is that hes never hit a boundary in tests in front of square of the wicket, or so we've been informed.Thought Martin had never hit a boundary against a Test-class team?
AWTA.Yet you are the person STILL using the derogatory nickname for him.
Your hypocrisy staggers me. Only yesterday on another thread, you were saying that Atherton shouldn't be judged on his initial performances when he wasn't ready for test cricket. As such, I would expect that you wouldn't have called him "Atherturd" or "Atherbysmal" based on those early games, but its different for a player that you don't deem fashionable and isn't a Pom.
You were more than willing to make crass assumptions about O'Brien's ability based on a couple of poor early games, despite the testament of other members who've seen a lot more of him that those games were not a fair reflection of his ability.
And as for you getting fed up of me calling you out for making digs at O'Brien, I'm guaranteed to keep doing it if you don't put that ****ter of a nickname to bed.
The 1998/99 series? Where his 16 (3 fours) at The MCG played a huge part in England winning their only Test on the tour?Anyone remember Alan Mullaly and his potential world record in the Ashes quite a few back? Came out and hit a couple of fours in a 14 IIRC. Was one of the most entertaining innings by a tailender I've ever seen![]()
I don't think so somehow. I don't have bias towards or against players based on their nationality, and I couldn't give two hoots for fashionability.Your hypocrisy staggers me. Only yesterday on another thread, you were saying that Atherton shouldn't be judged on his initial performances when he wasn't ready for test cricket. As such, I would expect that you wouldn't have called him "Atherturd" or "Atherbysmal" based on those early games, but its different for a player that you don't deem fashionable and isn't a Pom.
Yeah he was roundly condemned by the few posters who were sitting on here in the middle of the night for doing such a thing.I have to say, watching Jimmy Anderson bowl bouncers at Chris Martin in the recent Test series was a pretty unedifying sight.
I thought Sidey was a decent tailender. As too Hoggy, Isnt he one of the best nightwatchmen around? Anderson and Panesat are mugs.The 1998/99 series? Where his 16 (3 fours) at The MCG played a huge part in England winning their only Test on the tour?
Mullally, however, once batted nine in a Test.With Tufnell and Giddins adjudged - rightly - to be even worse. David Graveney promised after that game that England would never again pick such a weak bottom four (Caddick was at eight). So what happens in Sri Lanka 8-and-a-half years later? Yes - they pick Sidebottom, Hoggard, Anderson, Panesar.
Which was even worse.