Quite. It's like comapring diamonds to dogturd, frankly.Haigh is comfortably better than Roebuck in every facet.
Like this guy's blogI really wish that the cricket media would get a bit more cheerful. If they stopped constantly going on about doom and gloom and enjoyed the cricket that's being played, I think we'd all be a lot happier.
Obviously, I don't mean discussions around security and so on... but more around T20, slow over rates, sledging etc.
lol
It certainly isn't the best of affairs, but the silver lining is that it seems to be limited to the media largely. The players themselves see more sense in deriving enjoyment from the game and getting on with each other. For example, todays paper carried an interview with Yuvraj who mentioned that he keeps in touch with Ponting over the phone to sort out his batting. The way the media paints relations between players, one would have imagined the Indian and Aussie players reserved the silent treatment for each other off the field (with obvious exceptions). I'm glad to see the players still see themselves as part of a cricketing fraternity.I really wish that the cricket media would get a bit more cheerful. If they stopped constantly going on about doom and gloom and enjoyed the cricket that's being played, I think we'd all be a lot happier.
Obviously, I don't mean discussions around security and so on... but more around T20, slow over rates, sledging etc.
There were several kids I believe, and they were South Africans, Afrikaners to be precise. Roebuck used the defence that they would be used to such treatment coming from their background. But how does that explain why he liked to look at the marks he'd made on them? And even if you leave that fairly disturbing behaviour aside, he broke the law. I am one of those people who believe hitting children does not make them behave any better. Some, indeed most of the biggest ****-ups I knew as a kid came from homes where corporal punishment was common practice. In any case, whether corporal punishment is acceptable or not hardly matters, the fact that Roebuck suffered for utilising it is, because it explains why he acts the way does about his homeland.Wasn't the kid he hit South African?
Glad from a personal point of view I had SA discipline beat into me even though my mum is English, I always wondered why I only got the belt when we were in SA though!
I sometimes wish the English woman I used to live in SA with would instil a bit of discipline into her kids.. Absolute rotters as Peter Roebuck would probably say..
When doom and gloom is all there is, there's no point pretending things are better than they are.I really wish that the cricket media would get a bit more cheerful. If they stopped constantly going on about doom and gloom and enjoyed the cricket that's being played, I think we'd all be a lot happier.
I've always enjoyed his writing but I wouldn't let him within a bull's roar of any child of mine
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1359991/Ex-Somerset-captain-caned-young-cricketers.html
Caning is a crime in UK????I've always enjoyed his writing but I wouldn't let him within a bull's roar of any child of mine
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1359991/Ex-Somerset-captain-caned-young-cricketers.html
Oh yes and, as you can see, it is one that is taken very seriously ... its nothing like Tom Brown's Schooldays anymore .................... nor indeed much like fredfertang's schooldays ..... which may be a good thing or it may notCaning is a crime in UK????
Yours truly have had enough canings when young. For offences ranging from parodying the national anthem to tying together knots of two girls sitting front.Oh yes and, as you can see, it is one that is taken very seriously ... its nothing like Tom Brown's Schooldays anymore .................... nor indeed much like fredfertang's schooldays ..... which may be a good thing or it may not