Indisputably the best of the septuplet of Roberts, Holding, Garner, himself, Walsh, Bishop and Ambrose for mine.And yeah, agree about Marshal too... not only was he "short" for a fast bowler in general, compared to his peers who were all generally over six and a half feet tall, he was rather tiny. And yet, he was arguably the best of them.
Allan Donald
All right, we know he was good, and we know you're his biggest fan, but two's a crowd. Especially separated by 7 minutes.Allan Donald
Arguably did slightly better than his max talent.Mark Richardson.
Well, obviously he was massively talented and had a fantastic career, but I generally think of people who had not-quite-top-class talent and yet still had a very successful career when answering this question. Of course, that's just my take on it .Allan Donald
Doubtful whether Kapil and Botham had "better" talent than him.Imran Khan is the first player to come to mind. Not nearly as talented as Botham or Kapil but had the ambition, professionalism and dedication to achieve more and become a better player. Worked more on his game than perhaps any cricketer who has come from the subcontinent, pushing himself from a medium pacer to a worldclass fast bowler and a supporting bat to one of Pakistan's key batsmen.
Are we talking about batting or bowling?Chris Martin.