Originally Posted by pup11
Seriously speaking White hasn't even proven himself with the bat or even with the ball in Odi cricket so how can Shipperd come up with such a ridiculous statement, i know there is bias in his comments being the Victorian coach, but even in that case he would have been better off suggesting the name of somebody like David Hussey rather than White.
Originally Posted by pup11
I really don't buy into this one wrist spinner and one finger spinner deal, as far i am concerned one should pick their best side, and just picking Krejza because he is a finger-spinner is dire, yeah if your finger-spinner is effective then its always good to have one in sub-continental conditions, but otherwise its just dire to have finger-spinner in the squad for just the sake of having one, which is pretty much the case with Krejza' selection.
As i said before White is all hype no substance so far at international level, we all know he can play aggressively but in Odi cricket we haven't seen him do anything substantial neither with the bat or ball, and his domestic form last season wasn't great either, so all in all to even mention White' name as a possible member of the test squad is dire, if Shippherd really had to take a Victorian name as possible replacement to Symonds then he could have named David Hussey, that would still have been a bit more easier to digest.
Originally Posted by pup11
WTF? I mean why can't they just pick Casson, or if they wanted a batsman who could bowl a bit then they could have gone in with David Hussey who unlike White has had two very good last FC seasons with the bat, White has hardly done anything substantial to deserve a call-up to the test side, awful decision on the part of the selectors to pick White, but having said that i still expect him to bowl better than Krezja.
Casson though still would have been my choice, the guy is a handy lower order batsman and as lowly as his bowling might be rated, he is still Australia' next best spin option after McGain.
Originally Posted by pup11
I think the first problem in playing an all pace attack is that over-rate would go down terribly, and there is a very real chance of the fast bowlers breaking down with that sort of workload in testing conditions like the one's they are gonna encounter in India, Clarke or Katich can only be seen as partnership breakers at best of times, but to expect them to bowl longish spells and keep things tight is pretty unrealistic imo.
You need a spinner in sub-continental conditions, but its just Australia's luck that their spin options are limited to dire spinners like Krejza and White.
Originally Posted by pup11
Tbh, i would even play a jet lagged White over Krejza, White's bowling is crap and his batting too won't set the world on fire batting as low as 8, but he is a much better choice on any given day when compared to Krejza.
Originally Posted by pup11
Where are the part-timers mate, they haven't looked keen on bowling Katich and as for Clarke one should use him cautiously, as he has a history of back problems and last thing Australia want is to lose their best player of spin by loading him with a considerable bowling workload and wearing him out, White is **** with the ball but even if he fails with the ball, which he most likely would, then still atleast one can expect a few runs from him.
On Indian tracks apart from maybe Mohali, playing four seamers is just not on, we saw Australia use four seamers in the practice game and they were virtually stuffed bowling all those overs.
Originally Posted by pup11
Whichever way that selection goes, one thing is for sure that a dire and undeserving player would get to wear the baggy green tomorrow