To be fair he did play over 50 tests. If he'd have done better he'd have played more tho, no doubt.Mark Ramprakash not playing enough tests.
Even more comical that the ball he was dismissed for on 99 should have been a no-ball, as Richardson oversteppedWarne scoring a test ton. It was almost comical how he managed to miss out on that.
Pretty impressive that he managed to bowl the ball and catch it near the fence too. That slow-poke race of his, all an act.Even more comical that the ball he was dismissed for on 99 should have been a no-ball, as Richardson overstepped
Thoroughly deserved 200.Jack Hobbs getting 197 rather than 200 First-Class centuries.
And no, he didn't get 199.
Henry Williams? Nah, he was a damn good ODI bowler. In the match in question, though, he was injured in his second over so could not influence the game in any way.That's only because Herschelle Gibbs is a forgetful clown, and the other fellow whose name escapes me was crap anyway.
Vettori. And I had zero sympathy for him as NZ had already dropped him at least twice.Even more comical that the ball he was dismissed for on 99 should have been a no-ball, as Richardson overstepped
It is for mine, beyond question. But Hobbs I think would probably be more famous with, say, 201 than 197. I often wonder whether people's attempts to manufacture 2 extra First-Class games into his record to put his century tally up to 199 has anything to do with trying to Bradmanise something of his.Thoroughly deserved 200.
Also, Bradman not averaging 100, though the legend is probably more romantic for his last innings duck.
It is for mine, beyond question. But Hobbs I think would probably be more famous with, say, 201 than 197. I often wonder whether people's attempts to manufacture 2 extra First-Class games into his record to put his century tally up to 199 has anything to do with trying to Bradmanise something of his.
Which games were these Richard? Excuse my ignorance.It is for mine, beyond question. But Hobbs I think would probably be more famous with, say, 201 than 197. I often wonder whether people's attempts to manufacture 2 extra First-Class games into his record to put his century tally up to 199 has anything to do with trying to Bradmanise something of his.
Bearders explains.Which games were these Richard? Excuse my ignorance.
Yeah it generally annoys me seeing batsmen dismissed in the 90s, and when people make as much of a habit as Slater and Stephen Waugh did, particularly so.All the 100's Slater missed out on because of his nerves.
If you see it as unfair that the public make a big fuss over centuries, then why does it annoy you that batsmen get out in the 90s, surely you shouldn't care.Yeah it generally annoys me seeing batsmen dismissed in the 90s, and when people make as much of a habit as Slater and Stephen Waugh did, particularly so.
Especially given how much store people set - unfairly - by centuries.