Yeah I knew that, was just wondering why Pickup was calling for a ban regarding poor sportsmanship when Collingwood rampantly disreguarded any codes a few weeks ago..No, nothing to do with that. It was for a slow over-rate.
South Africa bowled well enough at the top-order (were obviously lucky with the Cook wicket but then should have had Pietersen early) and the six-downwards from England has predictably been atrocious.Just following the cricket on Cricinfo, not on TV, so are England batting rubbish, are South Africa bowling well, or a bit of both?
I heavily criticised India for doing against India
Think the fact that it has barely changed in all these years suggests that, sadly, all the resignations you'll get won't alter much.As long term forum members will know, there are 2 things I hold of high value in International cricket.
They are a) You cant have too much batting (England doing similar to what I heavily criticised India for doing against SA this winter)
and
b) There must be a loose structure for selection that has some basis on merit and long term performance.
This England team has just ****ed it all into the wind and deserves everything it gets.
Clueless. There needs to be resignations as this composition is a joke.
After years of hoping the situation improves they go and take it to new heights of incompetence. Im sick
Haha, so which team are you supporting now?Come on, lose these last 2 wickets and get bowling.
Then I'll explain.So Collingwood was banned for that farcical Elliott run out against New Zealand? I don't see the difference really.. Gamesmanship of the worst order on both counts..