You do not get it do you,
espn star-measures the speed when the ball hits the ground ,
nine-measures the speed from the hand so its the real speed and is quicker
Actually, your ideal speed gun measures the area in between those two points.
http://www.gizmag.com/the-cricket-ball-that-measures-its-own-speed/9198/
channel nine-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ucvus4uiKE
espn-http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=invesDWAgPw
this difference is only of praveen kumar,if you do not believe it now
you are blind.
Yes, I now believe it. Now I wish I only studied physics for long enough to know how much speed a ball loses when bouncing.
There is nothing as T20 yorkers,he bowls good yorkers:
...which is what I said before.
R.p Singh is no rabbit with the bat
Actually, he is. He averages 6.5, FFS. That's well into 'rabbit' territory.
atleast you should not be saying so remember
how his patnership in perth with vvs laxman turned the match and he was saying to laxman that he is comfortable facing tait and laxman should face lee.
I've never rated Shaun Tait...he was utterly dire throughout. Fair play, though; that partnership (and innings) was annoying, even though the match had pretty much slipped away by that point, due to poor captaincy and batting, in the face of some decent bowling.
man,playing with 5 bowlers would have meant rotating the bowlers so that they do not get tired so they do not have to bowl long spells that the point in playing 5 bowlers
Indeed, RP Singh's presence would have lessened the workload of the five who did end up bowling. However, Sehwag actually looked threatening with the ball at times, hard though it is to believe. It was also more of a spinner's track than a paceman's track. I still think that RP Singh's figures were aided somewhat by his absence.
clark bowls well only when ball seams and pety and melbourne did seam a bit
Melbourne was difficult for the batsmen because of oft-low bounce, some reverse swing and a wet outfield - there wasn't that much seam.
This is a generalisation, anyway, given his good performance in Adelaide 2006/07, where no-one else in the Australian bowling line-up did anything until the second innings.
It is, however, true that he tends to be less effective on 'roads' than he is everywhere else, though. It doesn't mean that he doesn't bowl well on them, in particular. It just means that he takes less wickets.
he is ineffective on flat tracks as he simply does not have a yorker or pace to trouble the batsman
He has a pretty good yorker. Not great, but good.
I reckon his lack of variety (i.e - slower balls) and relative inability to generate reverse swing in comparison to Brett Lee and Mitch Johnson are greater problems than his pace. McGrath, too, lacked pace, but still did very well on subcontinental pitches, due to having a greater repetoire of deliveries than Clark. He also has greater control and can generate more reverse swing, too.
he is a experienced bowler and rp singh is learning so you cannot expect a younster to
match a experienced guy.
While I wouldn't expect it too often, it is possible for a relative youngster to outperform an 'experienced' guy, particularly if the difference in ability between the two is substantial. It may also happen if the 'experienced' guy is out of form, or if the youngster is running hot. It also depends on how much hype is around the youngster. There's quite a lot around RP Singh, in proportion to his mediocre Test record, in particular.
In the end, though, Clark out-performed RP Singh. By your standards, if Clark acted as cannon fodder, then so did RP Singh.
also it was rp singh first tour to australia.in england
he bowled well and build up pressure also.
Yeah, OK. I can only judge him on how he bowled, though. The fact that it was his first tour doesn't mean a whole lot by itself (the fact that he was young may, though). It is not uncommon for debutants, or greenhorns, to have spectacular tours (like Bob Massie in England 1972).
your analysis shows the good deliveries were mainly to tailenders,the fact is he was
no threat to indian toporder he just kept bowling wide out side the off stump.
He was a threat to Rahul Dravid and also caused Sourav Ganguly some issues later on. So that's not entirely true. Again, the fact that he got tailender wickets doesn't, by itself, indicate how well he bowled in general (although I'd prefer top-order wickets over tailenders, obviously).
unless he starts to swing the ball which i doubt he ever will he will
a odi bowler
Agree, but isn't that drifting off-topic?
wait for the champions trophy in pakistan if you say australian picthes are flat,pitches in sub continent
are mother of flatbeds in the world
It makes watching any Ind.vs.PAK series an utter chore, but flat decks matter less in ODI's than they do in Tests, as more swing can be coerced from the white ball than the red ball. The game also doesn't last long enough for the pitch conditions to take a serious toll on bowlers.
