It's weird though, its astonishing how politicized it is. Such an overwhelming percentage of actions supported by England are also supported by South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, and opposed by the Asian block, and an equally large amount of actions are supported by India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Zimbabwe and opposed by the rest. West Indies tends to be the only board that doesn't seem to be in one camp or another most of the time, followed by South Africa.
I can understand that some politicization is inevitable, but this is ridiculous. BCCI were powerless for most of cricket's history, and the Imperial Cricket Council pretty much ran cricket like their own personal fiefdom, and India just look like they're trying to just do some payback, and unfortunately it shows their childishness, hurts cricket, and keeps the whole thing fractured. Obviously, BCCI are not alone in fault, but they are a big part of the corruption. You can't have a body made up of corrupt politicians and have avenues of advancement within the organization determined solely by politics, and then expect that body to act in an altruistic manner in the international stage. Unfortunately, something radical needs to happen to the internal structure of the BCCI before we see some changes at the ICC level. The rot runs deep.
Haha, that could be a decent article...just slag off on the BCCI for eight paragraphs.