That the internet would be a much smaller (and perhaps less interesting) place if only those who knew what they were talking about, actually did?Just to tickle the palate and to start a small debate, I am going to list the ten bowlers Lillee covers but in the alphabetical order so as not to give away the ranking.
Its interesting to note some of Lillee's comments. He does not want to comment on people he hasn't seen or "not seen enough of" or did not "play with or against". Clearly he listens to "from what people tell me" or from what "I'm told". Obviously those who have told him about Proctor (the bowler he was) or Marshall (the bowler he was likely to become) were people who had seen these greats or maybe even played with or against them. He values there comments and therefore mentions that. He still prefers to list those he saw more of, played with or against in order not to be "unfair on the others".
A lesson there for most of us??
This forum would have , what, four posters