Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
If I'm allowed to call John Howard a prick, I'm allowed to call Andrew Symonds a prick.Again, bemused as to how this is acceptable...
If I'm allowed to call John Howard a prick, I'm allowed to call Andrew Symonds a prick.Again, bemused as to how this is acceptable...
You know my spelling can be as dodgy as that call that gave Symonds outLazarus. The other bloke is a kickboxer isn't he?
Are they still mic'd up these days? If they are there shouldn't be an excuse.With the LBWS having umpired I can understand that there are times where it's hard to know the exact height of a ball and an LBW decision just going over the stumps like Hussey is understandable that an umpire would give it out.
I just don't understand how Cricket Umpires don't realize a batsmen has hit the ball. I know in the Cricket I've umpired the bowlers have been slower and the game is slightly less important, but still I can't believe it.
Umpires should go back to the olden days and stay further from the stumps, cause they are spending too much time looking to see if the bowler has bowled a no ball.
Dravid one was pretty vital,so was ganguly's.At a vital time I meant. Not getting Symo at 6/180 or whatever it was isn't a vital time at the match.
The Dravid one was at a vital time and the Indians went nuts. We've had 2 at a very vital time.
But when there's a noise as a ball goes past bat & glove close together in Sydney with the keeper up, it's a disgrace to appeal?It wasn't as obvious as you say it was. It was a ridiculously late edge too.
I have no interest whatsoever in soccer, so was unaware of that.Lazaridis is an Aussie footballer. Played in the English Premiership for a while
I do not think kumble had a problem with that appeal.But when there's a noise as a ball goes past bat & glove close together in Sydney witht he keeper up, it's a disgrace to appeal?
That's the point really, isn't it? You reckon Kumble didn't know Symonds hit that, yet you say with confidence the fielders must have known Dravid didn't hit his. Would be hilarious to hear a "it wasn't in the spirit" comment post-game tbh.
Kumble bowling so well here though, and how good was Sharma this morning? What a top spell from a rookie bowler. Great stuff.
Use technology. Certainly no-balls may be easy to pick, and if LBW's went to 3rd umpire , these edges should be reasonably picked up in reply (some cause for skepticism of things like Haweye for trajectory of ball for LBW, but not this).With the LBWS having umpired I can understand that there are times where it's hard to know the exact height of a ball and an LBW decision just going over the stumps like Hussey is understandable that an umpire would give it out.
I just don't understand how Cricket Umpires don't realize a batsmen has hit the ball. I know in the Cricket I've umpired the bowlers have been slower and the game is slightly less important, but still I can't believe it.
Umpires should go back to the olden days and stay further from the stumps, cause they are spending too much time looking to see if the bowler has bowled a no ball.
Agreed, has been a brilliant match and a really good series. Victory for India is not inevitable yet, although it will be when Gilchrist or Clarke gets out.Sucks that this thread has got all negative again. This is really good test cricket. Clarke is working really hard out there and is doing a great job, but the Indians are also doing really well in keeping up the pressure.
If, as seems inevitable now, India wins this game, it makes the Adelaide test very very interesting - something we've not said about the last test in a series since the last time India were here.