The thing is, Richard, list A ODs in India are NOT what you think them to be. They are played in a pretty poor standard ground, most of the time, with red balls and white clothes and nothing is really similar to the international game... The Ranji trophy takes a good 2 to 3 months but this tourney, if you can call it that, gets over in 15 days, 3 or 4 games within your zone and if you qualify, 2 or 3 games in the knock out stage and that's it... It is hardly anything to measure a player by. It is improving in the last couple of years, but before that, it was a joke and one should NEVER go by those stats. I can think of AT LEAST a few players who have had even worse List A records who went on to be good for ODIs for India...He's never scored ODI runs. Never. And he'd never scored them in domestic cricket while others had. Awful, awful selection.
Pretty much spot on.for the first test i think pakistan should go with this line up
shoaib, asif, gul and kaneria and they should play afridi also.. his spin bowling would be plus with his bating...
they should have rahman in the team also.. if kaneria didn't perform, rahman in for him..
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/india/engine/match/260495.htmlHe's never scored ODI runs. Never. And he'd never scored them in domestic cricket while others had. Awful, awful selection.
The only rubbish bowler is Kaneria, all the rest are pretty good to me, as everyone will soon find out themselves.Asif, Akhtar, Gul = rubbish?
and Richard perfer shabbir over gul lol ? right
i can't seem to find a reason why shabbir isn't in the team yet...
how do u guys think pakistani bowling line up will look like?
cosidering that the pitches would be spin.. will pakistan play two spinners (danish and rahman) or go with three fast bowlers (umar, shoaib, asif) and a spiner (danish/rahman)?
for the first test i think pakistan should go with this line up
shoaib, asif, gul and kaneria and they should play afridi also.. his spin bowling would be plus with his bating...
they should have rahman in the team also.. if kaneria didn't perform, rahman in for him..
I don't see how one can be close to certain about that; he might, obviously, but his career to date has been extremely poor indeed. He's certainly not well on the way.Richard how can you say Gul is rubbish? Unbelievable claim. He's going to become a very very good ODI bowler, and he's well on his way already.
Success might not mean much, but how is it possible for a failure to be a better bet than a success?The thing is, Richard, list A ODs in India are NOT what you think them to be. They are played in a pretty poor standard ground, most of the time, with red balls and white clothes and nothing is really similar to the international game... The Ranji trophy takes a good 2 to 3 months but this tourney, if you can call it that, gets over in 15 days, 3 or 4 games within your zone and if you qualify, 2 or 3 games in the knock out stage and that's it... It is hardly anything to measure a player by. It is improving in the last couple of years, but before that, it was a joke and one should NEVER go by those stats. I can think of AT LEAST a few players who have had even worse List A records who went on to be good for ODIs for India...
Not saying DK is world class in ODIs or anything, but just pointing out that generally, the List A stats from India don't and shouldn't mean much.
List A runs tbf.
Did you not say that he has never scored them in domestic cricket. But Anyway here in ODIs :-Umm... those are ODIs?