But with only 6 batsman, it doesn't allow the batsman up the order to have the freedom to go for it early.Four bowlers for India would not be a bad option if they four they picked were reliable in the roles they were given. When one of them is Agarkar and two of them are spinners (and hence have limited situations in which they can bowl), four bowlers simply isn't enough. It's not like Gambhir and Uthappa offer so much with the bat that they demand selection ahead of a fifth bowler, either.
Of course not.Surely even Agarkar wouldn't have gone for 5 sixes in the last over!!!!
That's the thing, there's those two plus Trescothick if he's ever right again, plus there's now Wright doing well in his first game.He's talking about the side at full strength. Hence, Flintoff and Bopara.
Like Lara, for someone that is such a smart cricketer, Dravid has some stupid moves as captain. Really disappointing.Didn't understand that move from Dravid. Fair play to Mascaranes.
Nah, don't be a **** cricket fan.Agarkar once again proves how useless he is. I think I'm gonna turn the telly off if India aren't 60+ for zero after 10 overs.
Haha, scathing.Nah, don't be a **** cricket fan.
TrescothickThat's the thing, there's those two plus Trescothick if he's ever right again, plus there's now Wright doing well in his first game.
In the past Shah would have been a regular but these days I think he's just not quite good enough. Obviously like now there'll be occasions when there's a run of injuries and he'll come in.