Racism! tbhWith no C_C these days Murali threads seem to be descending into accusations of racism less than ever...
and if just accepts it mutely(or ignores it) and tries to get on with it, will that make them more or less likely to have another go? first of all these people are certainly not true cricket fans, so as far as such people are concerned, i would think they would just raise the degree of abuse to get some attention(which is why they are doing it in the first place), at what point does it become unacceptable in your opinion?It's fairly obvious I thought: to not give his taunters the satisfaction. As it is he's shown he can be got at. Will that make them more or less likely to have another go?
no offense but it's not your problem in the first place, is it?Doesn't seem that bad to me, and as a rule I actually agree with MacGill. Obviously certain things are beyond the pale, but I've got no problem with people being dicks and yelling "no ball" if that's what they want to do. Sportsmen all over the world have to deal with that sort of thing from crowds, it's just that few are as controversial or as significant as Murali is, so he cops more.
The same, incidentally, applies to Gillespie being taunted by the crowd during the 2005 Ashes and so on. Not to racial abuse, threats of physical violence and so on, though.
That's fine, and Murali doesn't have to tolerate it. He can refuse to tour Australia or he can quit cricket and become an insurance salesman. That's all up to him. The point remains though that other cricketers do have to handle nasty treatment from the crowd and most manage to do so. It might not be the same as it is with Murali, but he's not the first and not the last.no offense but it's not your problem in the first place, is it?everyone has got their tolerance limits and for murali, it looks like it's getting taunted in a way that questions his achievements and his place in cricketing history in a country where the prime minister himself publicly called him a chucker...
although we are focussing on murali's issue in this thread, i agree that it happens to other players as well and they probably grit their teeth and bear it(although i doubt whether any of the other cases have the same degree of hateful abuse)... all i am saying is that just because it happens to players and some(or most) manage to ignore it doesn't make it right and doesn't mean that it should be tolerated...That's fine, and Murali doesn't have to tolerate it. He can refuse to tour Australia or he can quit cricket and become an insurance salesman. That's all up to him. The point remains though that other cricketers do have to handle nasty treatment from the crowd and most manage to do so. It might not be the same as it is with Murali, but he's not the first and not the last.
So you condone it?That's fine, and Murali doesn't have to tolerate it. He can refuse to tour Australia or he can quit cricket and become an insurance salesman. That's all up to him. The point remains though that other cricketers do have to handle nasty treatment from the crowd and most manage to do so. It might not be the same as it is with Murali, but he's not the first and not the last.
Nah.So, if Murali wants to avoid a real"bagging", all he needs to do is BOWL a ball and not CHUCK it.
I don't think thats possible. He needs to devote all his time to wine tasting sessions and picking out cricketing kits with full arms so his elbows stay covered when he finally gets to bowl.Macgill should concentrate on his bowling.
Agreed on that point, i have visions of him being smashed...Macgill should concentrate on his bowling.
Um...no. Are people saying you're not allowed to voice an "honest, harmless opinion"? No. But we are allowed to condemn someone for their "honest, harmless opinion", which is what has been going on in this thread.Not OK for cricketers to voice their honest, harmless opinons say CricketWeb members.