***Official*** India in England

[Raghav]

Our fielding is horrible. I want an offside consisting of Yuvraj, Kaif and Raina again.

Unfortunately Kaif and Raina cant help today

 

[wpdavid]

Cripes, I've just read that Agarkar has played 188 odi's.

 

[Sanz]

44444444444444444444444444444444444444 again... Excellent start

This is spamming.

 

[The_Bunny]

In hindsight Englands bowling performance is starting to look very good.
And the batting (apart from the dropped chance) has been exellent

 

[Chubby Rain]

Raghav, this is a forum, not a chat room.

 

[Raghav]

This is spamming.

is it?

 

[Scaly piscine]

Cricinfo's commentary for Agarkar reads like a worthless bowler on Battrick.

 

[adharcric]

Our fielding is horrible. I want an offside consisting of Yuvraj, Kaif and Raina again.

Yuvraj, Karthik and Chawla is a decent off-side cordon as well. Unfortunately, we have to put at least one of them in the outfield because the other guys are useless.

 

[Raghav]

Raghav, this is a forum, not a chat room.

thanks for infoming

 

[Prince EWS]

yes

Spamming is against the rules. If you want to admit to it like that, I'll be more than happy than to link James to your post that does so - especially since it iself is spam - so that you can have 7.

EDIT: Nice edit btw, but I saw that.

 

[wpdavid]

Forgive me being late on this, but why isn't Zaheer playing?

 

[Raghav]

Yes.

what is spamming?

 

[The_Bunny]

After the first two balls this has been good bowling by Patel.

 

[adharcric]

what is spamming?

Spamming is against the rules. If you want to admit to it like that, I'll be more than happy than to link James to your post that does so - especially since it iself is spam - so that you can have 7.

.

 

[adharcric]

Forgive me being late on this, but why isn't Zaheer playing?

Down with a flu.

 

[Prince EWS]

Cricinfo's commentary for Agarkar reads like a worthless bowler on Battrick.

It's being kind then. Wouldn't make Zimbabwe's team at the moment IMO - except maybe as a specialist batsman.

 

[Raghav]

.

Why that post was a spam?

 

[grecian]

I may have mentioned before that I care not a flying **** for ODIs, but I am really happy at Cooks two innings here. He's shown in tests on a number of occasions that he gets bogged down often, then gets out to a wafty attacking shot. Yet these innings will help him in proper cricket hopefully.

 

[adharcric]

Wow. Haven't seen Munaf hit 85 mph in a long time. Come on boy.

 

[Prince EWS]

Why that post was a spam?

No spamming - Spamming is characterized by the initiation of threads or posts that contribute nothing to a forum, be it off topic or on topic. Examples include: empty bodies, bodies with few words that have no relation to the current thread or discussion and those posts that state they are spam, either to annoy or increase a member's post count. This determination is made by the forum Moderator or Administrator and is not up for discussion.

IMO your post wasn't really spam as it commented on the "excellent start" but it was fairly borderline. Watch it anyway - don't post unless you think it'll add to the discussion. And while I'm quoting rules to you...

No trolling/baiting - This is where you constantly make digs at a member who doesn't appreciate it with the hope of annoying them and/or getting a negative reaction out of them. Don't do it.

Forum atmosphere - Members causing detrimental effects to forum atmosphere are subject to bans.

You might want to keep those in mind as well.

All that said, a tour thread is really no place to discuss such matters, so this friendly warning will be my last post on the matter in here.