Cycling's base principle is just cycle enough to get to the finish. Not everyone out there is trying to win by going as fast as they can and those that actually are more likely to win the most stages usually end up coming home at the end of the 3 week tours practically last showing how multi-faceted it is.Pretty poor from Matteh how he builds up cycling as some sort of great sport and then derides Athletics. They have the same principles. Run fast/throw far/jump high etc and cycle fast.
Indeed, I'm no cycling expert but it annoys me how you are slagging off athletics for being boring, monotonous and simple, when cycling is pretty much the exact same thing. Not for a fan of either sport, obviously, but for a neutral I think they would find athletics far more interesting to watch, and don't usually put down the different events.Cycling's base principle is just cycle enough to get to the finish. Not everyone out there is trying to win by going as fast as they can and those that actually are more likely to win the most stages usually end up coming home at the end of the 3 week tours practically last showing how multi-faceted it is.
Do you think that strategy plays no part in Athletics? The 800/1500 are as tactical as it gets, who can forget Kelly Holmes brilliant strategic performance in Athens 04. And long-distance running is not jogging. Grinds my gears thatMatteh,I TOTALLY agree with you. masses of strategy needed to win a race like the TDF and similar races.
Naah long distance is clearly jogging until the last 400m really and then it's whoever can sprint around the track and keep it up to the line that wins.Do you think that strategy plays no part in Athletics? The 800/1500 are as tactical as it gets, who can forget Kelly Holmes brilliant strategic performance in Athens 04. And long-distance running is not jogging. Grinds my gears that
Since when does cycling go around literally the same 400 metres over and over? (track cycling excepted.) Watching people run around the same flat 400m track is clearly more boring to watch than cyclists going along a large stretch of road, some of which is flat, but you get undulating terrain and then of course mountains. Not to mention that it goes through some of the most beautiful areas in the world. Now compare that to the view inside a stadium and well meh.Indeed, I'm no cycling expert but it annoys me how you are slagging off athletics for being boring, monotonous and simple, when cycling is pretty much the exact same thing. Not for a fan of either sport, obviously, but for a neutral I think they would find athletics far more interesting to watch, and don't usually put down the different events.
Once again you seem to fail to grasp the fact that athletics isn't exclusively running around a track. I realise there are different aspects to cycling, even on the Tour de France there will be hill stages etc.Since when does cycling go around literally the same 400 metres over and over? (track cycling excepted.) Watching people run around the same flat 400m track is clearly more boring to watch than cyclists going along a large stretch of road, some of which is flat, but you get undulating terrain and then of course mountains. Not to mention that it goes through some of the most beautiful areas in the world. Now compare that to the view inside a stadium and well meh.
Please tell me you don't actually believe that? I challenge you to "jog" for 26 miles 385 ydds in 2 hours 19 minutes. As the son of a relatively successful marathon runner, and a former long-distance runner myself, you are so far off the mark it's not true. I suspect that you know that though.Naah long distance is clearly jogging until the last 400m really and then it's whoever can sprint around the track and keep it up to the line that wins.
What about Marathon running? Cross-country?Since when does cycling go around literally the same 400 metres over and over? (track cycling excepted.) Watching people run around the same flat 400m track is clearly more boring to watch than cyclists going along a large stretch of road, some of which is flat, but you get undulating terrain and then of course mountains. Not to mention that it goes through some of the most beautiful areas in the world. Now compare that to the view inside a stadium and well meh.
Hahaha. So dire.Naah long distance is clearly jogging until the last 400m really and then it's whoever can sprint around the track and keep it up to the line that wins.
Didn't picture it itbtPlease tell me you don't actually believe that? I challenge you to "jog" for 26 miles 385 ydds in 2 hours 19 minutes. As the son of a relatively successful marathon runner, and a former long-distance runner myself, you are so far off the mark it's not true. I suspect that you know that though.