I disagree. I think you should drop and take whoever you want regardless of age.well that is true, but at some point you do need to start building for the future, right? and how many oldies do we have who can come in and perform like what ganguly has done? as it is, this team was called the dad's army because of the abundance of 30+ and close to 30 players in the team....another reason to bring in youngsters would be to improve fitness and also one of our weakest areas, fielding and catching....
Right. I don't think it would be that big a gamble if it did go through whenever.well agreed about his cricketing brain, and if the lessons have been learned and if he gets the right teams and the right selectorial support and is able to motivate his men and is able to lead from the front, he might just turn around that poor captaincy record...i am a huge tendulkar fan and would love to see him succeed, however as you can see, there are a lot of "ifs" in that approach....and given what has happened in the past and given the fact that you hardly ever get ideal scenarios, it's a big gamble at best....
Saurav was a great captain - however his time as a batsman and fielder has passed. Did you see how lazily he runs between the wickets - is that the example you need for younger cricketers entering the team ? Chappell should never have been allowed to treat him the way he did (shame on Pawar) but he is done as a batsman. Dhoni is too focussed on his star status. That's obvious. By the way Uthappa ahouls never have been selected. Talk about hubris - this guy was telling the media how great he is even before he went to WI.and whats your reasoning for droping ganguly & dhoni?
Yeah the gulf between him and Harbhajan, who is apparently in the rung below him in ODI spinners is so huge its unbelievable. I mean we already knew it, but it was just the difference yesterday.The difference between India winning and losing yesterday was Muralitharan.
hhhmmm so, you'e saying ganguly's time is gone? but he's been scoring 50's almost every game since he's been back...so from what do you get his times gone? so a player needs to be droped if he's focussed on his star status? would have prefered if kaif was chosen instead of Uthappa but thats was because of the oppening thing. and they should think about their next move before firing chappell...and if tendulkar can play well enough to 2011 whats wrong with that?
Yeah, leaving out Ramesh Powar and not playing Dinesh Karthik was insane. Powar offers a huge upside in my view and Karthik is a gun in the field.Harbhajan - 9 matches - 7 wickets
Kumble - 4 matches - 6 wickets
Pawar - 2 matches - 5 wickets
And Harbhajan was our #1 spinner.
What can you say ? One thing you can say about Kumble and Dravid - they always give it their all. Always. As does Karthick.
And we don't play Kumble and Karthick.
Amazing
You still want India to go through, even though they've played like crap? Team India will learn absolutely nothing from this experience if they go through to the Super 8's. It's more beneficial to India in the long run if they are bundled out and return with some egg on their face.Wasn't before, but now I kinda' am... Go Bermuda!!!
Let's see. How exactly do they become demigods? That's right, the ****ing media. FFS, say what you want about dropping Tendulkar but don't defend the media.JustTool said:I hope the media and the people DEMAND more accountability from these demi-Gods. It's about time !
Didn't they just say that?It would be simple if Chappell and Dravid would just say:
"We F'd up. Our process and preparation didn't work."